Re: ZL-1 #61
 

I dont post much here if at all. BUT from past experience(not a good one!)i can say stay away from iamsteved. i wont get into it but unless THE reggie jackson proves otherwise i would say use extreme caution.

Re: ZL-1 #61
 

[ QUOTE ]
He did clear this up ..in his reply to my question.
...see his reply at the bottom of the ebay ad
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayIS...ASS%3AUS%3A1123

[/ QUOTE ]

I stand corrected ... however I am not sure this is THE born with engine for #51 (NOT 61) or it was one of the many engines that was in #51 ... ???

regardless, *I* will not be buying it ... https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/smile.gif

neat stuff for sale there still

Re: ZL-1 #61
 

Yes, coming away from reading his reply I still do not understand the original origin of the motor. There is alot of collusion in his words - there is mention of several motors, some specific references and then the final answer goes back to being very general and not specific.