The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Supercar/Musclecar Discussion (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=79)
-   -   1970 Chevelle SS Marketing Photos (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=143346)

Lee Stewart 07-16-2017 01:49 AM

https://s26.postimg.org/w7wfp3r6x/image.jpg

Lee Stewart 07-16-2017 01:49 AM

https://s26.postimg.org/3wavs27ah/image.jpg

Keith Seymore 07-17-2017 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L78racer (Post 1359928)
looks like the red nova has the undercar 'curtains'?

Rally wheels painted black, too.

K

Keith Seymore 07-17-2017 03:56 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee Stewart (Post 1360393)

I had an opportunity to work with David Kimble when we introduced the GMT800 trucks.

I provided the engineering data and specifications and he produced cutaways of the engines and body structure.

Very cool and talented individual.

I'm also the guy that is responsible for the throttle body being kicked up at an angle like that. I had design/release for the engine air induction system on the truck platform side; Darn Powertrain engineers put the throttle body on the front of the engine right behind the cooling fan, not leaving any room for the air induction duct.

I suggested angling the inlet so that I could make the turn from the right front fender, honoring their airflow restriction requirements.

K

mockingbird812 07-17-2017 06:53 PM

Most impressive Keith. Glad someone is on the ball!!!!

Lee Stewart 08-12-2017 05:34 PM

https://s26.postimg.org/ru538pwtl/image.jpg

Lee Stewart 08-12-2017 05:35 PM

https://s26.postimg.org/whb5ahk6h/image.jpg

Lee Stewart 08-12-2017 05:38 PM

https://s26.postimg.org/6obae4m09/image.jpg

How riske' is this unused PR photo . . . that girl is naked!

Lee Stewart 08-12-2017 10:21 PM

https://s26.postimg.org/r3gygoju1/ch...o_ss_350_5.jpg

BCreekDave 08-13-2017 09:30 PM

Noticed in the first post the omission of the solid lifter L78 and LS-6 engines from the engine options. Was this pretty typical of Chevy back then?

Lee Stewart 08-14-2017 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCreekDave (Post 1363933)
Noticed in the first post the omission of the solid lifter L78 and LS-6 engines from the engine options. Was this pretty typical of Chevy back then?

Yes - none of the brochures showed the L78 396 option (Nova, Chevelle or Camaro) nor the LS6 for the '70 Chevelle.

AFAIK and this is speculation . . . both options defied corporate's ban of engines in mid sized cars that were less than 10 pounds per 1 horsepower. Yet in 1966 the L79 was in the Chevy II brochure.

Lee Stewart 08-14-2017 10:43 AM

https://s26.postimg.org/w0zkyws4p/image.jpg

BCreekDave 08-14-2017 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee Stewart (Post 1363974)
Yes - none of the brochures showed the L78 396 option (Nova, Chevelle or Camaro) nor the LS6 for the '70 Chevelle.

AFAIK and this is speculation . . . both options defied corporate's ban of engines in mid sized cars that were less than 10 pounds per 1 horsepower. Yet in 1966 the L79 was in the Chevy II brochure.

How did the 1970 Z28 fit into this? In the corporate vision did it weigh more than 3600 lbs? Maybe like the L79 Chevy II it slipped through th cracks.

Maybe it was because the Z28 was a complete option package and not just an engine option? Who knows.

Lee Stewart 08-14-2017 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCreekDave (Post 1363976)
How did the 1970 Z28 fit into this? In the corporate vision did it weigh more than 3600 lbs? Maybe like the L79 Chevy II it slipped through th cracks.

Maybe it was because the Z28 was a complete option package and not just an engine option? Who knows.

Remember - the ban was lifted for the 1970 model year. That's when the 455s came out in the 442 and GTO along with the 454 for the Chevelle SS. So a 360 HP engine in a 3340 pound Camaro wasn't that big of a deal. And again there is no mention of the L78 396 for the 1970 Camaro (or Nova) in the brochures.

By 1970 the Muscle Car Era was perched on the edge of a cliff so to speak. Pushing it to that point was the Insurance Industry along with the Fed. One year later - it fell off that cliff.

BCreekDave 08-14-2017 12:55 PM

True. I forgot about the ban being lifted in 1970, but I guess that's what confused me a little. The brochure in the first post was from 1970 and it didn't list the solid lifter engine options. Maybe the brochure was designed-printed prior to the ban being rescinded.

442w30 08-14-2017 11:23 PM

I think I've seen 396/375 mentioned in literature several times, but that's the exception. I'd have to look to see which items I've seen 'em in.

Lee Stewart 08-15-2017 12:01 AM

https://s11.postimg.org/b1ookkqg3/image.jpg

AFAIK this ad was the only time the L78 375 HP 396 is ever mentioned


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.