The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Ebay & other seen ads section (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=139)
-   -   Gorgeous '69 Chevelle #s L78 4-sp Convertible (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=169916)

scuncio 12-04-2021 04:36 AM

Gorgeous '69 Chevelle #s L78 4-sp Convertible
 
Another beautiful car where the seller is claiming an original block with no pics. Great looking car, but no docs and a replacement Muncie...would sure be helpful to see that engine pad pic. I'll ask the seller if he can provide one.

Link to 1969 Chevelle L78 Convertible auction

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/SHQAA...Zs/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/5YwAA...aI/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/oyoAA...b6/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/rZkAA...dI/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/f20AA...fu/s-l1600.jpg

136679B408043

GotGrunt 12-04-2021 05:10 AM

The trim tag is missing the L code, and the tag also looks way too crisp to me.

scuncio 12-04-2021 05:12 AM

Good call on the L code...personally I believe it's an original tag as it has the right Baltimore anomalies, but I'd also expect to see the L on a Super Sport car.

William 12-04-2021 12:38 PM

The seller is in Germantown, WI, a short drive for me. Don't know much about '69 Chevelles but would volunteer to go there for a look.

ls6owner 12-04-2021 01:19 PM

I thought the L was only on Leeds cars?

Oliver

Mr70 12-04-2021 01:22 PM

The L code was used on Kansas City Mo. Leeds Assembly plant tags,not Baltimore,as this one has.

scuncio 12-04-2021 01:41 PM

Yep, that’s what I get for posting too late at night.

GotGrunt 12-04-2021 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ls6owner (Post 1573636)
I thought the L was only on Leeds cars?

Oliver

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr70 (Post 1573637)
The L code was used on Kansas City Mo. Leeds Assembly plant tags,not Baltimore,as this one has.

1969 Chevelle Baltimore tags also had the L code for SS equipped cars. 1969 only.

scuncio 12-04-2021 06:10 PM

Man, I thought so too. So, the BM would become BL, correct?

GotGrunt 12-04-2021 06:18 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by scuncio (Post 1573668)
Man, I thought so too. So, the BM would become BL, correct?

Exactly :biggthumpup:

Bill Pritchard 12-04-2021 06:52 PM

From the auction wording: "This Chevelle has received a very detailed nut and bolt frame off restoration to a level that most cars never receive."

Which apparently includes the incorrect grilles over the cowl vents, an a/c upper radiator hose, chrome piping on the edge of the bucket seat bottoms, and the wrong master cylinder :(

chevelleshack 12-04-2021 09:06 PM

And the seats bolted on top of the carpet ......

wayoutz 12-05-2021 12:00 PM

looks awesome. Depending on what he wants all this small stuff is easy fix.

Mr70 12-05-2021 02:16 PM

I was referring to Ls6owners Q about the single letter "L" on the bottom used in '70.

wayoutz 12-05-2021 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GotGrunt (Post 1573655)
1969 Chevelle Baltimore tags also had the L code for SS equipped cars. 1969 only.

so is this trim tag correct for this car?

65blackcoupe 12-05-2021 05:33 PM

This probably deserves its own post, but is there enough evidence now to conclusively say an "L" on Kansas and Baltimore 69 tags denotes SS? Just as we are with X codes on 69 Camaros. IMO I believe so on Kansas cars, unsure on Baltimore as I haven't seen as many Balt tags as Kan tags, but there are far better minds here than I.

GotGrunt 12-05-2021 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr70 (Post 1573743)
I was referring to Ls6owners Q about the single letter "L" on the bottom used in '70.

Different L, same meaning.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wayoutz (Post 1573751)
so is this trim tag correct for this car?

I still think the tag looks too crisp but would like others to chime in with opinions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 65blackcoupe (Post 1573765)
This probably deserves its own post, but is there enough evidence now to conclusively say an "L" on Kansas and Baltimore 69 tags denotes SS? Just as we are with X codes on 69 Camaros. IMO I believe so on Kansas cars, unsure on Baltimore as I haven't seen as many Balt tags as Kan tags, but there are far better minds here than I.

IMO, the 1969 Baltimore L is just as conclusive and the one found on 1970-72 KC cars.

Bill Pritchard 12-05-2021 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wayoutz (Post 1573751)
so is this trim tag correct for this car?

My guess is that the TT is original to the car, but the car has been cloned into an SS396. The only 'evidence' the seller is relying on to try and justify it being an SS396 is a non-pictured engine block stamping, and I think we all know what a risky assumption that is. Cloned or real, it is indeed a nice looking car with a number of common 'restoration' mistakes that are fairly easily corrected.

PeteLeathersac 12-06-2021 12:24 AM

'

Cool car but questions + Volo in its past enough for me to keep moving...
http://classiccardb.com/chevrolet/53...ctory-new.html

:beers:
~ Pete

.

wayoutz 12-06-2021 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Pritchard (Post 1573782)
My guess is that the TT is original to the car, but the car has been cloned into an SS396. The only 'evidence' the seller is relying on to try and justify it being an SS396 is a non-pictured engine block stamping, and I think we all know what a risky assumption that is. Cloned or real, it is indeed a nice looking car with a number of common 'restoration' mistakes that are fairly easily corrected.

I dont feel anything is correct but beautiful car.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.