The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Supercar/Musclecar Discussion (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=79)
-   -   Help to ID 1964-65 Muncie 4 speed (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=169997)

Ralph Spears 12-11-2021 02:28 PM

Help to ID 1964-65 Muncie 4 speed
 
There is no VIN but main case is casting # 3851325 Tag on side cover#3780800 is it close or wide ratio

Jimlt4383 12-11-2021 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralph Spears (Post 1574442)
There is no VIN but main case is casting # 3851325 Tag on side cover#3780800 is it close or wide ratio

Ralph,1 ring on the input shift is close 2.20 ratio. 2 rings is wide 2.56 ratio. No rings is m22 on the Muncie factory input shafts.

MarcDant 12-11-2021 04:55 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I have a 64 input shaft with 24 teeth with no rings (wide ratio) , the tag that was removed from same tranny that reads 3841435 if i remember correctly was a 3.36 rear ratio. Maybe some one can confirm .

jeffschevelle 12-11-2021 06:01 PM

The 3780 beginning part number does not make sense for a 64 or 65 Muncie trans. 3780 correlates to part numbers originally issued in about 1960 or 1961. Numbers of course can continue to be used for years, but since Muncie's did not first exist until 1963 that would not be the case here. For example, the part number listed in the AIM for a 1964 Chevelle Muncie (wide ratio) is 3841435.

So the tag probably does not go with that trans.

You can at least narrow down the maincase to being original to either a 64 or a 65 trans. 64 maincases have a smaller rounded casting boss on the top rear center of the case (where it is drilled and tapped for the hole for the top center tail housing bolt). 65's have a much larger rectangular boss which looks like 66 and later cases.

John Brown 12-11-2021 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimlt4383 (Post 1574455)
Ralph,1 ring on the input shift is close 2.20 ratio. 2 rings is wide 2.56 ratio. No rings is m22 on the Muncie factory input shafts.

Early Muncies don't follow the same rules as later ones do. I also had a wide ratio 2.56 (325 case) with no grooves on the input.

Jimlt4383 12-11-2021 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Brown (Post 1574498)
Early Muncies don't follow the same rules as later ones do. I also had a wide ratio 2.56 (325 case) with no grooves on the input.

Thanks, do you know when they started using the rings?

Jimlt4383 12-11-2021 11:11 PM

Looks like 63 through 65 had no groove on the m20 and 1 groove on the m21. I did not know that.

crash 12-25-2021 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffschevelle (Post 1574470)
The 3780 beginning part number does not make sense for a 64 or 65 Muncie trans. 3780 correlates to part numbers originally issued in about 1960 or 1961. Numbers of course can continue to be used for years, but since Muncie's did not first exist until 1963 that would not be the case here. For example, the part number listed in the AIM for a 1964 Chevelle Muncie (wide ratio) is 3841435.

So the tag probably does not go with that trans.

You can at least narrow down the maincase to being original to either a 64 or a 65 trans. 64 maincases have a smaller rounded casting boss on the top rear center of the case (where it is drilled and tapped for the hole for the top center tail housing bolt). 65's have a much larger rectangular boss which looks like 66 and later cases.

The rounded casting boss change over was the middle of Dec. of 1964, well into 1965 production.
I have found several articles stating what Jeff posted, but I check over 100 325 cases and could not find a rectangular boss until late Dec. of the 1964 calendar year, which is 1965 production year

Hope this helps... Crash

Ralph Spears 12-25-2021 11:07 PM

I found out it is a wide ratio

TAR6569 12-27-2021 10:42 PM

Ralph, is the date code stamped in the 64 location by where the side cover mounts? Also, is there a partial vin starting with a T stamped on the edge of the tailhousing where it mounts to mid plate?

Ralph Spears 12-28-2021 08:43 PM

Muncie
 
I have photos of 2 stamp locations but i am unable to post pictures on this site send me your email and i will send them to you

Ralph Spears 12-28-2021 09:13 PM

I am able to post photos on every other site but this one unable to figure out how to do it

TAR6569 12-29-2021 01:56 PM

I will send you a PM with my email address

TAR6569 12-30-2021 02:50 PM

Ralph emailed me some photos and we figured it out! Was a 65 M20 out of a Pontiac 233-235 or 237xx body style with 3.55, 3.08, 3.23 or 3.36 ratio axle as it still had the part number tag attached 9780800. This makes sense with the vin stamp on top of the case with no letter for the assembly plant. 308123, which is quite high and P0609 assembly date in the 65 location didn't line up for any Chevy assembly plants. Curious which Pontiac plants assembled the most cars in 65.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.