The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Supercar/Musclecar Discussion (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=79)
-   -   Unsuspecting buyers with repro documents (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=148823)

fsc66 05-04-2018 08:37 PM

Unsuspecting buyers with repro documents
 
Deleted thread

PeteLeathersac 05-05-2018 12:40 AM

'

Subject VIN 194677S10652
You know it Paul but worse may be how bogus paper touted as genuine also raises other questions?:hmmm:
Looks like they sidestepped eBay on the deal too...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1967-Chevro...-/323221301665

:beers:
~ Pete

.

Charley Lillard 05-05-2018 03:25 AM

Shouldn’t you tell him if you know the docs are fake ?

fsc66 05-05-2018 04:19 AM

Yes
 
Deleted thread

mssl72 05-05-2018 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fsc66 (Post 1399795)
Yes Charlie, I should. The issue is that the Admin on the C1 C2 site has an issue with me when ever I point out that repro documents are being presented as authentic. He has removed me from the forum when I sited repro documents being represented as authentic when members were selling cars and advertised the documents as originals. He claimed I was interfering with forum member sales.

Paul

That's not cool, Paul!

PeteLeathersac 05-05-2018 12:47 PM

'

Too late to save the guy anyway so why burst his happy buyer bubble now?
He'll probably Google the Vin and land here at some point...whether he wants to believe the realities then or not.
Again, repo docs presented as genuine often raise other concerns that could be more serious than the hokey paperwork itself.
:hmmm:
~ Pete

.

Lynn 05-05-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PeteLeathersac (Post 1399759)
'

Subject VIN 194677S10652
You know it Paul but worse may be how bogus paper touted as genuine also raises other questions?:hmmm:
Looks like they sidestepped eBay on the deal too...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1967-Chevro...-/323221301665

:beers:
~ Pete

.

I think you are missing the last "2".

194677S106522

So Paul, someone on the Corvette forum asked why no charge for leather. Just curious. Is that one of the reasons (I am sure there are others) why you know it is fake?

Mr70 05-05-2018 04:08 PM

I've said it before and I'll say it again.
When you own a car with reproduction docs for your enjoyment,the day you sell it,tear them in up front of the new buyer and throw them in your own garbage can.
That way you can now be disconnected with them as ever being presented as real in the future,and the new buyer has to order new repro docs and will help keep the repro doc guys in business.
Like Paul. :)

fsc66 05-05-2018 04:26 PM

Deleted thread

MosportGreen66 05-05-2018 05:23 PM

WOW. I've seen this happen too many times. There is a guy on FB who sells fake documents identical to the ones posted by buyer of the '67 Corvette. It is fraud. Any time I see a red '67 BBC convertible with side pipes and claimed leather interior I cringed because I'm fearful the car may also have a reproduction trim tag. That is my emotion here - not fact.

The moderators of the Corvette Forum are puppets for a marketing company who own the site. They are not car guys, they are revenue seeking employees following bylaws made during round tables. Paul, don't take it personally - I know wonderful hobbyists who have been subjected to the unfair treatment on the CF. Two of which are prominent members here...

Dan


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.