Anyone see this crap??????
 

Nevada Looking To Close Classic Car Loophole
https://autos.yahoo.com/nevada-looki...180000496.html

What's next on the agenda? This is ridiculous.

Rich

Absolutely. I have been trying to make the participants here on this board aware of the "PLAN" since 2016....

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=136111

All they have to do is institute a cutoff - like 1980 to qualify as a "classic car."

Calling a 2000 Camry a classic car is BS.

Funny! I had a 55-57 club guy tell me the same thing about my 1970 Z-28 when I started entering it in Vintage Chevrolet Club events in 1996.

It is all perspective. Of course once the car is obsolete and out of production it is technically a classic.

But... once you starting tinkering with the rules the so called "RULES" WILL be retroactively applied.

Unfortunately, I think this is inevitable in most, if not all, states. What they really need to do is better define what a classic car is. Just because a car is twenty years or older should not define it as a classic. I have a friend with a daily driver 2000 Buick 4dr that he got from his grandfather. Not a classic IMO.

"In general, though a classic is any vehicle older than 15 years while an antique is more than 25 years old."

I am not so sure they can do it by date of manufacture. What about all those classics that have had newer motor transplants in them?

Interesting Reading from a year ago, this is how it is done:

https://www.motorious.com/articles/n...s-on-classics/

According to the Nevada article, I have a much better idea. Maybe the legislators can focus on helping low income and minority communities by aggressively combating homicides and crimes in those areas rather than worry about what vehicle fumes individuals in those communities are breathing.

Rich

hmmm.....I guess anyone who has had a heart transplant would have to change their ID to date of the donor.