There are probably a good number of Buick and Oldsmobile (and maybe Pontiac) muscle car folks who would disagree with your assessment.....

68 ARE unibodys as well. I think the 66/67 are as well.

I used this for my daily driver for 3 years till end of 2010 in the summers of SW Ontario Canada. Actually at the time, I also had a 1967 Ford F100 shortbox as my winter driver.

I have some pictures of my old '68 GTX clone B body from 2016. BUT will look at the house and see if I can get some older pictures from '83 when I owned it.

You got that right Arrowsmith. Except for the 4 inch wheelbase short-fall for the GM car, the track, overall length and width of Mopar 68-70 B-bodies and say, a 1970 GTO is nearly identical.

I've owned examples of both, including Hemi and Six Pack models, LS6 and Ram Air. For overall driving and comfort and build quality - it isn't even close! The full chassis GM had it all over Mopar in the intermediate class from 1968-1972. I can't even say that is my 2 cents, really - bet a lot of Mopar engineers from back in the day would agree if they were being honest ;)

Where are all the Torino or Rebel/Matador/Ambassador fans?

I was thinking the same thing.

Felt like I was in an alternate universe for a little while there.

K

Me too... :)

I think the original poster said it best when he started this thread " I'm a bit biased as my first car was a 68 GTX convertible clone, 440 4sp 4.10 Dana".


I can't compare because I haven't owned and B body Mopars. The E body Mopars, I can they have wow factor and I liked looking at my AAR, but much prefer driving a Z28. I agree that build quality was lacking on some Mopar products. They had damn great drivetrains!

Yeah, horrible riding, driving , handling cars that had near bulletproof drivetrains - I love 'em!