Trim tag assembly date question
 

As usual, about the time I think I have figure something out you guys post something that throws me for a loop.

There is a thread in another section, "COPO on ebay" where memvers are talking about 05E assembly dates. I thought the 5th week production months were March, June, September and December? As an accountant I am familiar with the 4-4-5 production/accounting week cycles but how did May end up with 5 weeks in 1969?

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

I don't think anyone has really come up with a valid explanation of the infamous "E" week. It's been offered that the first (A) week begins on the first Monday of a month and the work week was generally Mon-Fri. If the last days of a given month fall in the same Mon-Fri week as the first few days of the next month, they're considered the "E" week of the previous month.

Personally, I dont' buy it. I think it varies from plant to plant and each had their way of doing "A"..."E" weeks.

I track 66 & 67 Chevelle VINs and body tags and have found the following months and plants with "E" week tags:
1966 model year
Dec. (1965) - KC
Jan. (1966) - Fremont
Mar. (1966) - KC & Fremont
Apr. (1966) - Flint
May (1966) - Fremont
June (1966) - Atlanta & KC

1967 model year
Aug. (1966) - KC
Sep. (1966) - Atlanta, Baltimore, Fremont
Nov. (1966) - KC, Fremont
Jan. (1967) - KC
Mar. (1967) - Baltimore, Fremont
May (1967) - KC
June (1967) - Baltimore, Fremont

I'd bet other years and plants would show the same type trend.

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

Dale - Welcome aboard. Glad to see you posting here. Your web site is terrific which I have used for my research on numerous occasions. There are quite a few Chevelle fans around here and we could sure use your insight. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

Thanks Dale. I should have known it was not as striaght-forward as I had thought...

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

Each Fisher facility seemed to have the freedom to do the build weeks as they chose. So they only generally follow the actual calendar.

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

[ QUOTE ]
Dale - Welcome aboard. Glad to see you posting here. Your web site is terrific which I have used for my research on numerous occasions. There are quite a few Chevelle fans around here and we could sure use your insight. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll second that!!! https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

I've always thought as long as one day fell between the Mon-Fri.,it was considered an actual assembly week.
I can see June 1968 & March 1969 as having only 4 weeks,but May,Sept.& Dec. both look like 5 "E" work weeks to me in both 68/69 calendar years.

Here's those calendar years..
http://acs.flicklives.com/Timeline/1966_cal.html
http://acs.flicklives.com/Timeline/1967_cal.html
http://acs.flicklives.com/Timeline/1968_cal.html
http://acs.flicklives.com/Timeline/1969_cal.html

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

My car is a 5E


May 1970
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

I have a build date of the 29th

The dang dates for my cut & paste are funny when the post comes out the 1st & 2nd are Friday & Sat & the week of the 3rd through the 9th are pushed over Dang, but you get the idea I hope

Sorry for the crappy post

Link to http://www.flicklives.com/Timeline/1970_cal.html

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

[ QUOTE ]
I've always thought as long as one day fell between the Mon-Fri.,it was considered an actual assembly week.


[/ QUOTE ]

Not true. There's many exceptions to a rule like that. NOR may have an 01E week, but not LOS or LOR or TAR. I don't even see consistency within a plant...

Re: Trim tag assembly date question
 

I agree with you.
I meant to say that I always thought it only took as little as one day to fall between a Mon.-Fri. to be considered a work week,if a plant did indeed observe it all,as in Carls case above.