The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Technical & Restoration (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   69 Z/28 parts numbers (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=78659)

66vettex2 10-07-2004 03:29 PM

69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
What is the best reference manual(s) for identifying all part numbers used in the 1969 Z/28? I'm starting a restoration project and would like to hear from others who have gone down this road.

TDW 10-07-2004 03:32 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
The book by MacNeish.

66vettex2 10-07-2004 03:40 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
Got the book but need more detail info similar to the judging manuals by the NCRS.

camarojoe 10-07-2004 06:02 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
No such book exists...The book mentioned above is the best publication out there that is specific to the 69 Camaro Z/28, but of course, it can't contain everything there is to know. You're just gonna have to do your homework and compile your own resources... this site would be one good one!

lzdick 10-07-2004 06:34 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
66vettex2...You have a PM.

farone 10-07-2004 07:38 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
There are no so called "bibles" as to the correct restoration procedures. There are some very knoledegable people that do restoration work out there. They have based their knowledge by examining original cars to determine how things were done. The problem is, some of the people, who critique these cars, at some of the larger events, have no outlines to go by. I have been knocked for things that were clearly done just like they were done by GM at the factory....like smears of adheasive around the trunk weatherstrip, blobs of seam sealer at quarter panel seams, stamping marks where the quarter panels meet the rear body panel. These were intentionly done to duplicate the factory procedure. Other cars are allowed to get by with speaker holes cut out of the rear deck, and the transmission tunnel butchered out, but that's o.k. I almost got nailed for my driveshaft, because the one judge thought that the yokes should be in line, not offset. We showed him other cars that were like mine, one was a low mile original, untouched, unmolested big block, and the other was an original Yenko car. His response was that he would have to accept both, because his Yenko had the yokes in line !!! Maybe his is wrong ??? I really think a manual needs to be published, like the ones for the Corvettes. It would take alot of work, but I think that there are a lot of people that know these cars, that would be willing to contribute to this undertaking.

Steve Shauger 10-07-2004 08:21 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
Without a manual the standards by which cars are judged to are subjective . Objective standards in the form of a judging/restorer manual will go a long way in providing the necessary standards. The Vintage group (survivor judging program) I am involved with has a accumulated data which should be used in suggested manual. The driveshaft issue mentioned by Frank, was resolved by using the Vintage/Survivor cars we were judging. The manual has been discussed and amongst the judges and we need to move this forward.

JChlupsa 10-07-2004 08:50 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
Best book on 69 Z28s has yet to be written. Its still in John Z's head since he was there when they went down the line!!!

66vettex2 10-07-2004 11:46 PM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
Thanks for the insight into this matter and the PM's I received. I didn't realize that my question about a judging manual was such a hot topic. Not sure I have enough technical knowledge but would be willing to work on such a project.

Thanks again guys.
Harvey

DjD 10-08-2004 01:42 AM

Re: 69 Z/28 parts numbers
 
The 1969 Factory Assembly Instruction Manual (AIM) is full of part numbers...


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.