[69hurstSC]

All the poster needed to do was verify the VIN against the registry. Instead the claims continually changed from "can pick it up for less than 6 figures" to "just wanted to verify my evaluation of a $225,000+ price tag" to "sold for 201,000 he knows he could've gotten much more but apparently is personal friends with the guy and can visit the car whenever he'd like".

Why get it appraised and undersell the car? The selling price doesn't fit this claim, "It's a yenko 100% original numbers matching never restored". And it also doesn't fit the prices associated with a clone. In his very fist post he noted that it could be picked up for 6 figures and he has the first rights to the car. Yet in his 4th post he states this, "just wanted to verify my evaluation of a $225,000+ price tag". So, some of us skeptics saw an opportunity for a potential buyer to purchase a unrestored 69 Yenko Camaro for under $100,000 (when the poster estimated it's value at $225,000) and watched it fall apart after all these brazen claims and we weren't allowed to be suspicious that it's all fabricated?

I'd be willing to wager we never see the VIN or a TRUE picture of the assumed car. The poster will cry sour grapes and that will be the end of it. Apologize for being skeptical about a poster who wavered as much as he did? No.