Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Pit Area - Racing


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2002, 06:23 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Cam oiling vs. flat cams

I got an email from Tedford this afternoon, and guessing by his email he has been following the same thread over at Team Chevelle that I have, concerning flat cams and BBC's.

Here are a couple of links to products designed to help fight a flat cam in a BBC, as listed on Team Chevelle:

http://www.off-road.com/chevy/reviews/bbc_oiler/

http://www.competitionproducts.com/page57.html

It looks to me like the lifters would be the simpler way to go, but it seems that actually getting oil TO the camshaft/lifters is the problem. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 08-06-2002, 07:43 PM
bbdon bbdon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Posts: 382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cam oiling vs. flat cams

I personally do not think that either one of those solutions is needed on a big block with a stock cam. Just pour some eos on the shaft before bolting on the manifold, and pre oil before starting for the first time, and you should be OK. I have done a few, and Ive never had a failure. If you run a cam with steeper ramps and heavier springs, maybe then you will see a problem. From setting the valves on a BB while it was running, I can say from experience that they seem to pump plenty of oil to the top end, so I don't think that is the problem. You need or you will get lots in the eye. If you are running a modified engine, maybe you want a roller cam anyway. With a roller cam set up, you will probably want to actually restrict some of the oil flow to the top end.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2002, 01:18 AM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Cam oiling vs. flat cams

The problem is not top end oiling but rather the amount of splash that the cam gets. With the standard springs things are ok. The L78 and L72 motors weren't running enough spring pressure for the rpm they were capable of but the cam would last a long time. Not enough spring pressure is probably the number one reason that so many of them dropped valves and ruined the block and heads. At the least this setup would be cheap insurance and at the worst it can't hurt anything when using heavier springs.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2002, 11:58 AM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,735
Thanks: 446
Thanked 2,442 Times in 622 Posts
Default Re: Cam oiling vs. flat cams

You may also want to look into the composite lifters. They have been used in exotic racing engines but are now being produced at lower cost. The composite lifters are very light weight and very low friction. There is a company making them for BB Chevy but I don't recall the name.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.