Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-29-2024, 02:56 AM
68camaroz28 68camaroz28 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 260
Thanks: 44
Thanked 94 Times in 61 Posts
Default

It does look better the last two engine pics as it did seem too silvery and shiny looking for what IMO it should look like. Still a nice step up from what it did look like I'm sure.
__________________
68,69&2015 Z/28's
69 L78 Nova Purchased new 32k miles
69 Restored Nova L34 Father/Son
Few Corvettes
Our 68 Z/28 Build thread- http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=182584
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-29-2024, 04:16 AM
1967Z28's Avatar
1967Z28 1967Z28 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Golden Bear State, USA
Posts: 2,171
Thanks: 1,984
Thanked 1,391 Times in 520 Posts
Default

Too silvery and shiny in my opinion as well. The repro valve covers are very evident with the wavy ends on them.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-29-2024, 04:23 AM
cheveslakr cheveslakr is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 499
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 325 Times in 143 Posts
Default

I've cleaned several that are fairly rare and never painted them or blasted them. Mostly just strong detergents and gray scotchbrite then steel wool. The steel wool will provide a bit of sheen, so use with caution. They take on the look more akin to the alum. thermostat housings, more of a dull grey, vs. the silvery look. That, to me anyway, is accurate. No protectant on the eddy, boeshield on the winters manifold.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cheveslakr For This Useful Post:
olredalert (11-28-2024)
  #24  
Old 11-15-2024, 05:10 PM
downunder1's Avatar
downunder1 downunder1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 298
Thanks: 5,609
Thanked 309 Times in 90 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McCune View Post
Looks similar to may process.
Can I ask please what process you used?

Thanks,
John
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-28-2024, 01:34 AM
CamarosRus CamarosRus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Auburn,WA (between Sea&Tac)
Posts: 2,675
Thanks: 113
Thanked 247 Times in 90 Posts
Default

Other than post #24, NOBODY gives McCune props for his EXCELLENT Restoration of his Manifold. Mr McCune ownes a company that does professional/commercial restoration of Alumnum Auto Parts (as does Mr Jackson) ..........Correct me Im wront but the sand casted manifold in post #9 was restored by a shot blasting machine using clean metal shot that has not been contamintaed doing cast iron/steel parts.......
From what little knowledge I have, I believe aluminum sand castings were metal shot blasted by the OEM to remove excess sand and slag.........

Here are a few pics of my Muncie Case (Sand Cast) and Tailhousing/Side Cover (Die Cast)...........

I'm currently concerned with what/how best to "coat" these parts to prevent any corrosion forming........There are a variety of sprays, or thin film coating from Everbrite or CERAKOTE
Attached Images
    
__________________
Chuck Sharin
[email protected]
Auburn,WA (30 miles South of Seattle)
70 Camaro R/S Z-28, L-78, R/S SS
69 Camaro COPO "recreation"
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CamarosRus For This Useful Post:
napa68 (11-28-2024), olredalert (11-28-2024), RPOLS3 (11-29-2024)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.