Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
03-26-2013, 01:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is "stance" important?
Love them all, but I think the Camaro wins....
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to scuncio For This Useful Post: | ||
Carleen (06-18-2019), Outlaw68Nova (11-03-2018) | ||
|
#2
03-26-2013, 02:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
3 L78s & L79.
Sorry for poor pics.They are 30 years old.The grey L78 had 4.56 gears so I used a truck 78 series tire to cut the gear down on the street.The gold L78 had stock suspension and the green one had tired suspension  .I know the black L79 looks goofy.I told the spring shop I wanted the body over the the rear tires to clear an 11.50 slick.It had 4.88s so again the tall tire cut the gear down.My dad said the car looked like a frog that landed on a hot rock.lol.I wacked a lot of big blocks with that car. Ya.I was a crazy kid.  
|
|
#3
03-26-2013, 02:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: scuncio</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Love them all, but I think the Camaro wins....
</div></div>I'll be the first to admit that I've always had a thing for Grady's Red '67 Camaro! This . . . . is what Camaros are supposed to look!
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22 1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
