Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2017, 11:18 PM
MarcDant's Avatar
MarcDant MarcDant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Canada North york Ont.
Posts: 288
Thanks: 107
Thanked 113 Times in 53 Posts
Default

IMO , i don't think its a myth about the harder material content . It clearly states that the new design 1969 engine block has a new stronger construction , tougher cylinder block and extra firm bearing caps in this 1969 gm Camaro brochure. Either way you can draw your own conclusion. Thanks Marc.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2017, 11:40 PM
big gear head's Avatar
big gear head big gear head is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 3,382
Thanks: 5,656
Thanked 1,456 Times in 765 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
IMO , i don't think its a myth about the harder material content . It clearly states that the new design 1969 engine block has a new stronger construction , tougher cylinder block and extra firm bearing caps in this 1969 gm Camaro brochure. Either way you can draw your own conclusion. Thanks Marc.
The 2482 caps were nodular iron where most others were gray iron. I don't know if there were any other differences in the block materials.
__________________
Freddie
1969 Camaro RS/SS396 (427) 4 speed
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2017, 02:07 AM
ZLP955's Avatar
ZLP955 ZLP955 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,180
Thanks: 751
Thanked 253 Times in 182 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
IMO , i don't think its a myth about the harder material content . It clearly states that the new design 1969 engine block has a new stronger construction , tougher cylinder block and extra firm bearing caps in this 1969 gm Camaro brochure. Either way you can draw your own conclusion. Thanks Marc.
I posted this reply in a recent thread here:
Quote:
The 'high tin/ high nickel' story is actually just a myth, John Hinckley posted about this over at CRG:
"And, as it turned out after further research with the Saginaw Foundry (now called Saginaw Metal Casting Operations, part of the GM Powertrain Division), the old story many of us were led to believe about the 010/020 describing the tin/nickel alloy turns out NOT to have been true at all, although the magazines thought it was true and continued to publish the tale, and still do today.
Actually, the "010/020" cast into the front bulkhead under the timing cover turned out to be simply the identifier for the foundry pattern for the front bulkhead, which was shared by the 3970010 (350) and 3970020 (307) blocks; it had nothing to do with the iron alloy, which was never altered for any particular production block (although the alloy was altered for some later low-volume GM Performance Parts over-the-counter "Bowtie" blocks)."
__________________
Tim in NSW, Australia
1969 Van Nuys 04A Z/28 from Clippinger Chevrolet.
Cortez Silver with dark blue interior.
Ran at Lions Dragstrip and Pomona Raceway, with paint by Bob Kovacs of Fresno.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.