Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2018, 05:38 PM
novadude novadude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 739
Thanks: 3
Thanked 49 Times in 35 Posts
Default

So the '73 doors were the only thing that made the '72's "non-compliant"?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-2018, 07:46 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJUSA
Posts: 8,376
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,783 Times in 853 Posts
Default

The door beams were already in place from 1970. I thought it was the new for 1973, 5 mph bumper requirements as well as upgraded emissions systems? The 73 Firebirds have about 50 lbs more steel bracketry inside the nose. Also, the urethane nose itself is different though it appears very similar to the 70-72 noses to a casual observer. The grills are only half the depth of the 70 to 72 grills to allow for all that extra reinforcement. That is also why the hood release was relocated via a cable to the valance opening.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2018, 09:10 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novadude View Post
So the '73 doors were the only thing that made the '72's "non-compliant"?
The regulatory driver was (FMVSS 215), "Exterior Protection," which became effective on September 1, 1972 which required compliance with occupant protection to side impact to the doors which required the installation of large 22 pound beams (one in each door) and the needed internal reinforcement to the lock/striker area of the internal structure at the quarter panel.

The Government had previously provided exemptions to GM for extenuating circumstances...in the case of Norwood and the strike the Government was pressured to teach GM a lesson and when GM applied for the exemption it was denied. GM then tried to export the affected units to Canada which also failed.

in the end it was cheaper to crush them and clear the lines so 1973 production could get started.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2018, 09:23 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJUSA
Posts: 8,376
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,783 Times in 853 Posts
Default

Interesting! So the door beams actually got bigger and heavier in 1973. No wonder Gramma gave us her 75 Firebird after a couple years. She said the doors were too darn heavy to pull closed for a little, old, 90 pound Lady.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2018, 10:57 PM
Tracker1's Avatar
Tracker1 Tracker1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 3,366
Thanks: 923
Thanked 980 Times in 469 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njsteve View Post
Interesting! So the door beams actually got bigger and heavier in 1973. No wonder Gramma gave us her 75 Firebird after a couple years. She said the doors were too darn heavy to pull closed for a little, old, 90 pound Lady.
Yeah, 70s era F body doors gotta be the heaviest American door ever. Ugh, back-breaking.
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.