Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > L78/L89 specific Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2023, 01:02 AM
1967 4K's Avatar
1967 4K 1967 4K is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ky.
Posts: 1,002
Thanks: 4,157
Thanked 961 Times in 295 Posts
Default

Look at the second engine pic, the fuel pump to carb line is correct not like most repop ones on cars. Third pic I bet that is the original alt., black fan deep groove silver cad pulley.
Probably the original 3910 on it also. Hope you get it back someday.
__________________
Richard

1967 Camaro SS 396/375 4K
2002 Camaro 35 Anniversay Z4C-WU8
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2023, 01:36 AM
jbtech's Avatar
jbtech jbtech is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 556
Thanks: 566
Thanked 1,518 Times in 262 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1967 4K View Post
Look at the second engine pic, the fuel pump to carb line is correct not like most repop ones on cars. Third pic I bet that is the original alt., black fan deep groove silver cad pulley.
Probably the original 3910 on it also. Hope you get it back someday.
The carb date is 724, also note original 67 only valve covers, DG water pump flat rolled loop short dipstick (it's salmon color i have photos of the engine after rebuild). Interestingly, when speaking to the current owner of the engine, he mentioned the casting numbers didn't match on the heads although they were original. I'm guessing it had one 391 and one 840. Although he could have meant the dates didn't match.

Interestingly I know engine 7N212552 also doesn't have matching casting numbers on the heads after speaking with the last owner of that engine. (It is located in a pacer as NOM)
__________________
Jose Betancourt

67 Camaro L78

Last edited by jbtech; 09-27-2023 at 02:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-27-2023, 12:19 PM
1967 4K's Avatar
1967 4K 1967 4K is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ky.
Posts: 1,002
Thanks: 4,157
Thanked 961 Times in 295 Posts
Default

I noticed the correct valve cover. Another good piece is the upper alt. bracket, notice it doesn’t have the throttle spring return bracket on it . 67 Camaro only but I think that bracket was used on 65 n 66 big block cars.
Never heard about mis matched casting numbers on the heads before. Hmmm 🤔
__________________
Richard

1967 Camaro SS 396/375 4K
2002 Camaro 35 Anniversay Z4C-WU8
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2023, 01:45 PM
luzl78 luzl78 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: n.j.
Posts: 2,475
Thanks: 73
Thanked 437 Times in 293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1967 4K View Post
I noticed the correct valve cover. Another good piece is the upper alt. bracket, notice it doesn’t have the throttle spring return bracket on it . 67 Camaro only but I think that bracket was used on 65 n 66 big block cars.
Never heard about mis matched casting numbers on the heads before. Hmmm 🤔
my motor has a 391 and 840.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to luzl78 For This Useful Post:
jbtech (09-28-2023)
  #5  
Old 09-30-2023, 04:15 PM
Zedder's Avatar
Zedder Zedder is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,322
Thanks: 100
Thanked 638 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbtech View Post
The carb date is 724, also note original 67 only valve covers, DG water pump flat rolled loop short dipstick (it's salmon color i have photos of the engine after rebuild). Interestingly, when speaking to the current owner of the engine, he mentioned the casting numbers didn't match on the heads although they were original. I'm guessing it had one 391 and one 840. Although he could have meant the dates didn't match.

Interestingly I know engine 7N212552 also doesn't have matching casting numbers on the heads after speaking with the last owner of that engine. (It is located in a pacer as NOM)
My 4P L78 had 2 different original heads also.
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zedder For This Useful Post:
jbtech (10-06-2023)
  #6  
Old 10-01-2023, 03:42 PM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,353
Thanks: 32,277
Thanked 4,448 Times in 1,894 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbtech View Post
The carb date is 724, also note original 67 only valve covers, DG water pump flat rolled loop short dipstick (it's salmon color i have photos of the engine after rebuild). Interestingly, when speaking to the current owner of the engine, he mentioned the casting numbers didn't match on the heads although they were original. I'm guessing it had one 391 and one 840. Although he could have meant the dates didn't match.

Interestingly I know engine 7N212552 also doesn't have matching casting numbers on the heads after speaking with the last owner of that engine. (It is located in a pacer as NOM)
----I wonder if you offered another rebuilt big block for this one that obviously needs rebuilding if that might peek his interest. If he's thinking of building something (even if he doesn't) he would have an engine ready to go. What do you think?.....Bill S
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to olredalert For This Useful Post:
dykstra (10-03-2023)
  #7  
Old 10-06-2023, 12:30 AM
jbtech's Avatar
jbtech jbtech is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 556
Thanks: 566
Thanked 1,518 Times in 262 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olredalert View Post
----I wonder if you offered another rebuilt big block for this one that obviously needs rebuilding if that might peek his interest. If he's thinking of building something (even if he doesn't) he would have an engine ready to go. What do you think?.....Bill S
The engine is rebuilt and in a running Base Camaro RS. They rechromed the valve covers, use all original components with exception of arp head bolts. When I first spoke to the the current owners they have even considered pulling the motor because of the perceived value of the engine and constant maintenance.

I'm thinking when my car is up and running and I have that MQ engine done I'll do what Chuck (427 King) has advised and do a one time sweet offer of perhaps an engine plus cash plus cost of a swap, I just hope they are open to it.

My car has the docs, the rear, the history, and the hard to find parts. If the original engine can be reunited it will greenlight a restoration and I'd like to show the car at nationals before and after a resto with the original motor sitting beside the car (pre resto). What a story that would be and how cool would it be for the owners of the original motor to be a part of it. They have taken great care of the motor and I'm lucky it's even still around.
__________________
Jose Betancourt

67 Camaro L78

Last edited by jbtech; 10-06-2023 at 04:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jbtech For This Useful Post:
1967Z28 (10-06-2023), big gear head (10-06-2023), dykstra (10-06-2023), napa68 (10-06-2023), olredalert (10-06-2023), RPOLS3 (10-07-2023)
Reply

Tags
1967, 396 ss, l78 camaro

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.