Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2019, 06:11 PM
Astock Astock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.Calif.
Posts: 843
Thanks: 62
Thanked 211 Times in 123 Posts
Default

Sorry, no.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Astock For This Useful Post:
markinnaples (06-24-2019), Z-11 396 (06-25-2019)
  #2  
Old 06-24-2019, 11:56 PM
1971ls6's Avatar
1971ls6 1971ls6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 194
Thanks: 17
Thanked 76 Times in 52 Posts
Default

Chuck you are wrong, they know exactly every ZL1 made
__________________
1969 ZL1 COPO Camaro 11.60@120 F.A.S.T 21
1971 LS6 vette 12.20 @118 PSMCDR
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1971ls6 For This Useful Post:
Z-11 396 (06-25-2019)
  #3  
Old 06-25-2019, 02:22 AM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,649
Thanks: 252
Thanked 2,884 Times in 804 Posts
Default

L72 COPO production was buried in the Tailfins & Bowties data. The data was obtained directly from Chevrolet in the ‘80s and reprinted in the book. All of the oft-repeated ’69 Camaro production numbers-3,675 Z11s, 20,302 Z/28s-came from this data.

The data lists 1969 Camaro production by engine size; 230, 250, 327 et cetera. No 427 engine is listed but the figures total 243,085, same as 1969 production. COPO 9560 [ZL1] & 9561 [L72] build records always list L78 for some reason but not Z27 [Camaro SS].

Ergo, both COPO 427 options are included in the L78 totals.

The L48 [300/350] was the standard Camaro SS engine; 22,339 built. Camaro SS optional 396 engines; 13,659 built. Data shows 34,932 Camaro SS produced. Adding L48 and 396 totals, 22,339 + 13,659 = 35,998.

That’s 1,066 more than Camaro SS.

There were 69 COPO 9560 Camaros built; 1,066 – 69 = 997 COPO 9561 cars.

That means the L78 total of 4,889 is inflated. Actual L78 production would be 3,823.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
big gear head (06-25-2019), carnut4life (06-25-2019), kwhizz (06-26-2019), PeteLeathersac (06-25-2019), Z-11 396 (06-25-2019)
  #4  
Old 06-25-2019, 03:38 PM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,557
Thanks: 382
Thanked 389 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
L72 COPO production was buried in the Tailfins & Bowties data. The data was obtained directly from Chevrolet in the ‘80s and reprinted in the book. All of the oft-repeated ’69 Camaro production numbers-3,675 Z11s, 20,302 Z/28s-came from this data.

The data lists 1969 Camaro production by engine size; 230, 250, 327 et cetera. No 427 engine is listed but the figures total 243,085, same as 1969 production. COPO 9560 [ZL1] & 9561 [L72] build records always list L78 for some reason but not Z27 [Camaro SS].

Ergo, both COPO 427 options are included in the L78 totals.

The L48 [300/350] was the standard Camaro SS engine; 22,339 built. Camaro SS optional 396 engines; 13,659 built. Data shows 34,932 Camaro SS produced. Adding L48 and 396 totals, 22,339 + 13,659 = 35,998.

That’s 1,066 more than Camaro SS.

There were 69 COPO 9560 Camaros built; 1,066 – 69 = 997 COPO 9561 cars.

That means the L78 total of 4,889 is inflated. Actual L78 production would be 3,823.

Where do the L89 cars fit into that? Under the L78?

What about LM1 cars?

Just thinking out loud.

/R
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 69LM1 For This Useful Post:
Z-11 396 (06-25-2019)
  #5  
Old 06-25-2019, 05:26 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,649
Thanks: 252
Thanked 2,884 Times in 804 Posts
Default

L89 was not an engine option. It was an aluminum cylinder head option that required ordering the L78 engine. Factory docs for those cars always list both. The L78 total includes the 311 L89 cars.

LM1s are not COPOs, it was an RPO. Not rare, 10,406 built in the 4 months of availability. It was odd in that it required an optional transmission; the MC1 HD 3-speed was the cheapest at $79 and was dropped as an option at the same time.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
Z-11 396 (06-25-2019)
  #6  
Old 06-26-2019, 12:31 PM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,557
Thanks: 382
Thanked 389 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
L89 was not an engine option. It was an aluminum cylinder head option that required ordering the L78 engine. Factory docs for those cars always list both. The L78 total includes the 311 L89 cars.

LM1s are not COPOs, it was an RPO. Not rare, 10,406 built in the 4 months of availability. It was odd in that it required an optional transmission; the MC1 HD 3-speed was the cheapest at $79 and was dropped as an option at the same time.
I was aware that both are RPO's, I was wondering where they fit in the production numbers you gave. Ie, the L89's bundled with the L78, along with the COPO's if I understand you correctly.

The LM1' were bundled where? In the L65 (350),L48 (ss) or L30 (327)?

Just trying to follow the thought process.

Thanks,

/R
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"

Last edited by 69LM1; 06-26-2019 at 12:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 69LM1 For This Useful Post:
Z-11 396 (06-26-2019)
  #7  
Old 06-26-2019, 01:12 AM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,649
Thanks: 252
Thanked 2,884 Times in 804 Posts
Default

This would be a 'rare' triple COPO. Supposedly ordered out of Courtesy Chev, Sebring, OH. The hood stripe was a single Z/28 style stripe down the center of the hood and upper grille panel.

A ZL2 SS is also known to have the COPO stripe.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
scuncio (06-28-2019), Z-11 396 (06-26-2019)
  #8  
Old 06-27-2019, 04:06 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 15,981
Thanks: 495
Thanked 4,776 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=William;1452996]This would be a 'rare' triple COPO. Supposedly ordered out of Courtesy Chev, Sebring, OH. The hood stripe was a single Z/28 style stripe down the center of the hood and upper grille panel.

]
William .....does the car exist ?
__________________
......
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Charley Lillard For This Useful Post:
Z-11 396 (06-27-2019)
  #9  
Old 06-27-2019, 02:08 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,649
Thanks: 252
Thanked 2,884 Times in 804 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Charley Lillard;1453115]
Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
This would be a 'rare' triple COPO. Supposedly ordered out of Courtesy Chev, Sebring, OH. The hood stripe was a single Z/28 style stripe down the center of the hood and upper grille panel.

]
William .....does the car exist ?
I got that WS from the original owner years ago, not very conversant otherwise. He believed it became a full-time race car and was heavily modified last he knew. I didn't get a VIN. Could still exist.

The COPO striping was just like the Z/28, extending to the leading edge of the upper grille panel. This is from an ancient US Camaro Club ad. The owner of the car was looking for others.

I'm sorry Charlie. It just occurred to me you won't be able to sleep until you find one!
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
markinnaples (06-28-2019), scuncio (06-28-2019), Z-11 396 (06-28-2019)
  #10  
Old 06-26-2019, 01:45 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,649
Thanks: 252
Thanked 2,884 Times in 804 Posts
Default

Distinct options were tallied individually; then summed up elsewhere in the listing. There were 59,643 '69 Camaros built with 350 engines: 10,406 LM1, 22,339 L48, 26,898 L65.

Back in the day a HS bud had a new '69 Nova LM1/3-speed; another had a 383/auto/3.55 Road Runner. The Nova would put a fender on him nearly all the way down the strip. The 'runner would win but not by much. That Nova surprised more than a few people.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
69LM1 (06-26-2019), markinnaples (06-26-2019), Z-11 396 (06-26-2019)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.