Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-07-2005, 07:59 AM
Xplantdad's Avatar
Xplantdad Xplantdad is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 32,513
Thanks: 7,673
Thanked 5,830 Times in 2,004 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Don, Your car is beautiful...
__________________
Bruce
Choose Life-Donate!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-07-2005, 06:45 PM
Alss's Avatar
Alss Alss is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The tax State of New Jersey
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 19
Thanked 54 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Here is my .02 as well. My COPO does not have its original motor and I am almost glad that it doesn't. In todays market with all the " SH%#TY" people restamping motors to "make" a numbers matching car, and with the type of use these cars were intened for, flags always wave when a car states it has the "original numbers matching motor" I feel My CE block is acceptable for these cars as they were raced pretty hard. It helps that I have build sheets, POP imprints, the warranty repair order for the motor and other docs to back the car up. Does it hurt the value?? it may but not a substantial amount..the car is what it is and no one can change that.

ALbert
__________________
1969 9566AA COPO Chevelle M-22
1969 Malibu 489 ZL-1 T-56/4.56
1969 Beaumont 540 th400 3.70
1969 Chevelle 300 Deluxe 427 ZL-1 M 22W
1970 Olds 442 W 30 2 door post
1969 Ply. GTX 426 hemi auto. Blue.
1940 Dodge pick up Durango 4X4
1968 Camaro ragtop LSA ZL1
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-07-2005, 06:57 PM
ohhawk ohhawk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 430
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

I think njsteve and Rick H have summed it up well and the market prices have been reflecting this for quite some time. Kind of a sliding scale down with docs AND matching #'s being the top combination.

Don, did you see Legendary Motor Co. sold their version of your car recently?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-07-2005, 07:36 PM
ANDY M's Avatar
ANDY M ANDY M is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,011
Thanks: 59
Thanked 41 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Albert, I'm glad that you brought up the "driver" vs "Show Car" issue. My COPO has a CE motor, replacement M-21, but original BE rear end. I have no history beyond the previous owner, and the NICB that says it was shipped to Berger 6/2/69. Since I tell everybody who looks at the car that it's incorrect and incomplete, I get a lot less static.
If I were to put the car up for sale, IMHO, that would change dramatically. I drive it about once a week to a cruise in, but it's not any more than a #3 car on a good day.
You guys may have seen the pictures of it posted here, where I refered to it as a 20 footer. Point is, if you want a trailer queen, go for it. If you want a driver, go for it. It's not about the money until it goes on sale, or if you're in the market.
Andy
__________________

COPO 9561/9737 M40 X11D80
13.37 @ 105.50 on pump gas,drove it to NATL TRAILS and back [email protected] SCR22
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-07-2005, 08:21 PM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,557
Thanks: 382
Thanked 389 Times in 166 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Well said Andy!


[ QUOTE ]
Albert, I'm glad that you brought up the "driver" vs "Show Car" issue. My COPO has a CE motor, replacement M-21, but original BE rear end. I have no history beyond the previous owner, and the NICB that says it was shipped to Berger 6/2/69. Since I tell everybody who looks at the car that it's incorrect and incomplete, I get a lot less static.
If I were to put the car up for sale, IMHO, that would change dramatically. I drive it about once a week to a cruise in, but it's not any more than a #3 car on a good day.
You guys may have seen the pictures of it posted here, where I refered to it as a 20 footer. Point is, if you want a trailer queen, go for it. If you want a driver, go for it. It's not about the money until it goes on sale, or if you're in the market.
Andy

[/ QUOTE ]
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-08-2005, 02:39 AM
Don_Lightfoot's Avatar
Don_Lightfoot Don_Lightfoot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 1,193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

[ QUOTE ]
Don, did you see Legendary Motor Co. sold their version of your car recently?

[/ QUOTE ]
Didn't know that Dick, they had that car for quite a while. Wonder what it went for?????
__________________
Specialized Chevrolet Decals
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-08-2005, 04:09 AM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Craig S.,

The answer to your question is very simple.

Imagine TWO IDENTICAL cars.......one with it's original engine, the other with a replacement. It doesn't matter whether they are '68 Baldwin-Motion Phase III Camaros, Hemi Cuda convertibles, or '49 Nashs. One one with it's original engine will always be worth more.

Of course, there will be cases where due to different equipment or documentation between 2 cars, the one with the replacement engine may be worth more.....but to answer your original question, I think we (you) need to consider IDENTICAL cars in every aspect other than the engine....

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-08-2005, 04:32 AM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,903
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,503 Times in 1,421 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

You had me,right until you brought up the 49 Nash.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-08-2005, 04:40 PM
AutoInsane AutoInsane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Katy - TX
Posts: 942
Thanks: 41
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Good point Verne but that begs the question how much less should a car be worth with the CE block?

I had signed a contract to buy an Orange 70 1/2 Camaro 396/375 from Legendary Motor Cars a few years back. It was represented as numbers matching. (the price was $24,000) I subsequently found out it was a CE block and walked away from the deal. I am still kicking myself buying that car. I was just unsure as to the value with the CE block.

I would think in a more rare and sought after vehicle the numbers matching would matter less. Who here would pass at a Yenko with a CE block and would it really be worth that much less especially in today's market of guys tripping over one another to bid on cars?
__________________
Bill O'Brien

1974 Jeep CJ5 - 304 V8, Edelbrock Intake, Holley 650, MSD Ignition, Patriot Headers
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-08-2005, 05:30 PM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Original motor vs. replacement

Autoinsane,
How much less? Only the buyer can determine that. An impossible question to answer and apply to all cars.
Certainly, the Yenko with the CE block you mentioned would command a very high price, but again, what if there was an IDENTICAL Yenko next to it but with it's original block?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.