![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does they improve your ET on the 1320'?
![]()
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It does only if it has a certified LM1.
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 1970 L78 Camaro is rarer than a 1969 427 COPO Camaro, why is that not in the SUPERcar category.
The L78 has square ports, 11 to 1's, solid cam, 4 bolt main,forged pistons, dimple rods,780 holley,etc same as the COPO, it is a race car same as COPO. The L72/L71/L78 Corvettes are race cars also, basically with same motors. Now the L88/ZL1 these are truely special race engines in a higher category. I think that if you call a L72 COPO Camaro a supercar then a L72 Vette is also one. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It does only if it has a certified LM1. ![]() [/ QUOTE ] Now Dr. Seuss, why do I fee like this is the Star-Belly Sneetches discussion? I know what I've got and I am happy with it. Which was my point. Who would'nt be happy with that vette this thread is about? Finally, I'll never understand how a Deuce with a LT1 (which was the exact same engine in my 70 Z) is considered a "supercar" and a L78 is not. If the criteria is ET times, than how is the L78 "just" a camaro and the 1980ish Yenko "turbo"Z a "supercar"?
__________________
Rich Pern 69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier" |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL......just having fun.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Does they improve your ET on the 1320'? ![]() [/ QUOTE ] And some stickers that say "Deuce" do? And as far as the COPO Z's, yes, it is a proven fact that there was a peformance increase in Trans Am racing. ![]()
__________________
Rich Pern 69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier" |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Damn, Guess I was too thin skinned. Should have used a
![]() Cmon, admit it charley, you're jealous because you don't HAVE a LM1 in your collection! ![]() And, that was a joke! ![]()
__________________
Rich Pern 69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier" |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me pull a plug wire and I can get the same feeling without having to buy a car.....LOL
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I know I'll regret this but let's give it a try anyway.
The L-78 Camaro you reference, although a rare animal for 1970, was in fact available to the general public through ANY Chevy Dealer, just like the 435 HP Corvette. The LT-1 Nova (aka Deuce) was NOT an RPO code for the Nova in 1970. It was a specially built car made possible through the COPO process. General consensus here (the Supercar Registry/ sYc) is that RPO optioned cars DO NOT fall into the 'SUPERCAR' category as defined by this site. Another example: In 1968 an automatic transmission WAS NOT available to the general public behind the L-78 in a Nova. Fifty of those cars were built; COPO 9738. In 1969 it was available to the general public so the M-40 equipped L-78 Novas in '69 & '70 are not considered SUPERCARS. Confusing? It really has nothing to do with huge horsepower, or whether it's a BBC or SBC. It's more about Factory/Dealer built specialty cars here. On other sites you'll find other SUPERCARS, such as Ferraris, Lambos, Maseratis, etc. It just depends on where you are.
__________________
Don't mistake education for intelligence. I worked with educated people. I socialize with intelligent people. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well said Cumby, and right on. The only thing I would add is that the COPO order in question needed to be some sort of performance oriented change or upgrade, not to build a taxi cab or work truck. To answer the original question quite simply.... no.
__________________
Joe Barr |
![]() |
|
|