|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I read through all that and don't see any mention of whether the car was represented as real or fake or whether the buyer knew one way or the other.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Way to step up, and help rectify the situation.
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Shauger For This Useful Post: | ||
67since67 (05-08-2018) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
smart move by the seller take the car back. He would have big big legal problems
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Wonder how far back in ownership the fake tag & docs go ? Sounded like the seller was just selling it for his father's estate ?
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Good questions... Apparently the seller is not a car guy. Cars were owned by father. Sons want out. I have not spoken with sellers but they have more than one car. I find it tough to believe they did not know nor did they inquire. I don't want to infer further because they are taking the car back.
Dan
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/ |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That has happened to me on the Corvette Forum several times. Once I pointed out an issue with a trim tag it was an St Louis built body 67 Corvette with A.O smith built trim tag obviously the tag was changed. They treated me like I was trying to cause trouble. Every time I look at a car with any kind of documentation I approach them with the assumption that they are fake until I can prove it other wise. To many cars out there have original paperwork or "original drive-train" these days. If I didn't know any better it would seem like everyone (back in the day) babied their cars and knew they would be worth a lot of money one day? Matt. Last edited by Nasblu; 05-08-2018 at 03:47 PM. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Another 1967 Corvette on Ebay with purportedly original documents:
Deleted thread
__________________
[email protected] Last edited by fsc66; 05-14-2018 at 01:48 AM. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
----With that said, Paul, the actual sidepipes (not the covers) are very poor copies. Makes me wonder if the car came with sidepipes, although I see nothing other than the pipes to base that on........Bill S
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Paul,
If you look through the pictures of the trans, a 1967 Corvette Muncie should have a passenger side Speedo tail housing... So much for a correct restoration... Hope this helps... Crash |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
1967 Corvettes used a 584 tail housing (speedo hole on passenger side) not the earlier 429 casting used on 63-64 Muncie tail housing with the (speedo hole driver side). Some claim that early 65 corvettes used the 429 casting tail housing before the 584 but I believe they have never found an actual example of this being true.
|
|
|