![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The decision is that cars will communicate with each other and the Feds will require the technology in all new vehicles at a future date.
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/rolleyes.gif[/img] |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The decision is that cars will communicate with each other and the Feds will require the technology in all new vehicles at a future date.
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/rolleyes.gif[/img] </div></div> http://nation.time.com/2014/02/03/go...to-each-other/ The good thing is accidents will be reduced(supposedly), The bad, what will the information be used for? Upping your insurance rates everytime the sensor detects a miscue? Or, will insurance no longer be needed since accidents will cease? Yea, right!
__________________
69 SS/RS 396 M20 X22 Nor 12B,72B,712 bought 1979 FULL OWNER HISTORY 69 Dick Harrell tribute Day II 427 M20 4.10 X11 76 orig pnt, 711 67 Super Stock 302 Camaro re-creation |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ridiculous. There is NO way to implement a secure protocol enabling vehicles from disparate manufacturers / countries to communicate (similar to wifi / bluetooth) yet still prevent unauthorized access. Even if it were possible, it would have to be static (not randomly generated) and you could access <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="text-decoration: underline">any</span></span> vehicle's ECU and gain access to said protocol.
|
![]() |
|
|