Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:56 AM
ORIGLS6 ORIGLS6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fishin' in the Dark
Posts: 7,410
Thanks: 1,102
Thanked 508 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

[ QUOTE ]
To answer the original question quite simply.... no.

[/ QUOTE ]

Now why didn't I think of that! Ask me for the time and I'll tell you how to build a watch!
__________________
Don't mistake education for intelligence. I worked with educated people. I socialize with intelligent people.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-06-2007, 02:04 AM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,556
Thanks: 381
Thanked 388 Times in 166 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

[ QUOTE ]
OK, I know I'll regret this but let's give it a try anyway.

The L-78 Camaro you reference, although a rare animal for 1970, was in fact available to the general public through ANY Chevy Dealer, just like the 435 HP Corvette. The LT-1 Nova (aka Deuce) was NOT an RPO code for the Nova in 1970. It was a specially built car made possible through the COPO process. General consensus here (the Supercar Registry/ sYc) is that RPO optioned cars DO NOT fall into the 'SUPERCAR' category as defined by this site.

Another example: In 1968 an automatic transmission WAS NOT available to the general public behind the L-78 in a Nova. Fifty of those cars were built; COPO 9738. In 1969 it was available to the general public so the M-40 equipped L-78 Novas in '69 & '70 are not considered SUPERCARS.

Confusing? It really has nothing to do with huge horsepower, or whether it's a BBC or SBC. It's more about Factory/Dealer built specialty cars here.

On other sites you'll find other SUPERCARS, such as Ferraris, Lambos, Maseratis, etc. It just depends on where you are.

[/ QUOTE ]


OK, then how about the 70 Z28 COPO? It was tied closely to trans am racing? It was not available generally, and less than 500 were made?

Do I get a star on my belly?
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-06-2007, 02:11 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

No...but you are getting a red bullseye and we are going to use Tabasco coated pellets
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-06-2007, 03:03 AM
427king 427king is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Graceland
Posts: 3,136
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

What is an LM1?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-06-2007, 03:28 AM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,556
Thanks: 381
Thanked 388 Times in 166 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

http://www.69lm1.com

Basically, the 69 version of the 1967-68 L30/M20, but with less HP (255hp) but with many high performace options. They came with 12 bolt multi rear's and the base transmission was a muncie instead of the saginaw. Like the L30/M20, they had no external badging. Just a cool (In Charlie and I's opinion ) sleeper smallblock type car. Many are poverty cap cars, which make them look like.........
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-06-2007, 03:29 AM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,556
Thanks: 381
Thanked 388 Times in 166 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

[ QUOTE ]
No...but you are getting a red bullseye and we are going to use Tabasco coated pellets

[/ QUOTE ]

N'awlins remember? Tobasco is good on anything!
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-06-2007, 04:31 AM
Late BrakeU2 Late BrakeU2 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Malibu CA.
Posts: 1,118
Thanks: 9
Thanked 103 Times in 53 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

[ QUOTE ]
OK, I know I'll regret this but let's give it a try anyway.

The L-78 Camaro you reference, although a rare animal for 1970, was in fact available to the general public through ANY Chevy Dealer, just like the 435 HP Corvette. The LT-1 Nova (aka Deuce) was NOT an RPO code for the Nova in 1970. It was a specially built car made possible through the COPO process. General consensus here (the Supercar Registry/ sYc) is that RPO optioned cars DO NOT fall into the 'SUPERCAR' category as defined by this site.

Another example: In 1968 an automatic transmission WAS NOT available to the general public behind the L-78 in a Nova. Fifty of those cars were built; COPO 9738. In 1969 it was available to the general public so the M-40 equipped L-78 Novas in '69 &amp; '70 are not considered SUPERCARS.

Confusing? It really has nothing to do with huge horsepower, or whether it's a BBC or SBC. It's more about Factory/Dealer built specialty cars here.

On other sites you'll find other SUPERCARS, such as Ferraris, Lambos, Maseratis, etc. It just depends on where you are.

[/ QUOTE ]

O.K ..so if it's agreed that any RPO cars are excluded semantically from Supercar reverence,do the GMMG C5R race case cars qualify? They were only available through a limited dealer network-just like Bill Thomas/Dana/Nickey/Yenko,and were even emissions legal.Before you call them tuner cars,remember they share the same GM motorsports blocks which are in the ALMS Vettes that have won over 40 races from Lemans to Sebring to Daytona-pretty much mirroring what the L88's accomplished nearly forty years earlier.


Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-06-2007, 04:59 AM
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LS Make'um Better Guy
Posts: 7,746
Thanks: 853
Thanked 668 Times in 201 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

Another thing to consider.......is if the Car has a "Caution Fan Sticker"..........

Ken
__________________


The Best things in life......Aren't Things
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:02 AM
camarojoe's Avatar
camarojoe camarojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 5,305
Thanks: 237
Thanked 264 Times in 119 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

A supercar does not have to be a COPO ordered car if it is dealer modified...Ala Baldwin-Motion. Most if not all Motion cars were RPO ordered cars from GM, but were heavily modified from there, similar to the newer cars you're talking about. If an RPO ordered 435hp Corvette (the car mentioned in the original question) was modified at Motion, Yenko, etc. then it WOULD be considered a Supercar, even though it was not a COPO. This topic is as simple to some/difficult to others as the "what is a rebody" thread.
__________________
Joe Barr
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:12 AM
Paul D Paul D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

Is a 1963 Z-11 a Super Car?
__________________
PaulD
'64 R-Code Mercury
'62 421 SD Catalina
'66 L72 Impala SS
'66 R-Code Fairlane
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.