Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2009, 03:01 AM
442w30 442w30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gabba Gabba Hey! NYC
Posts: 2,531
Thanks: 219
Thanked 148 Times in 73 Posts
Default School me on SS427s!

A good debate here . . . this past weekend, had a good discussion with two guys at the Pure Stock race, as I love learning I was mistaken about something I have held to be true for awhile.

Specifically, it is about SS427s. I have held the belief the 1967 SS427 was an option package on the Impala SS; of course, the 427 was optional on the Impala SS separate from the SS427.

Two friends say that the SS427 was its own model, and one of their pieces of evidence is the fact (?) that the SS427 doesn't have any Impala badges.

Anyone can set the record straight here? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
Attachments - The Supercar Registry 421120-67SS427.JPG 420947-NSRARichmond20091966.jpg
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 09-24-2009, 03:10 AM
markjohnson's Avatar
markjohnson markjohnson is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL, MO.
Posts: 2,480
Thanks: 254
Thanked 568 Times in 229 Posts
Default Re: School me on SS427s!

http://www.impalass427.com/ Here's a great website for those cars and yeah.....it's true that the SS427 was it's own special model due to all the unique parts and badging on the car. That's always been one of my favorite things about them, especially the '67's! They really get to me! My father actually had a white 1967 SS427 4-speed car when I was growing up and sold it because my mother had trouble driving the stick-shift.
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22
1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-24-2009, 05:00 AM
442w30 442w30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gabba Gabba Hey! NYC
Posts: 2,531
Thanks: 219
Thanked 148 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: School me on SS427s!

Well, I don't think a website is proof, but do you realize the site supports my theory? It's not its own special model any differently than the Judge was its own special GTO model.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2009, 05:13 AM
x  Baldwin  Motion's Avatar
x Baldwin Motion x  Baldwin  Motion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 41N 72 18.5W Sag Harbor NY
Posts: 6,640
Thanks: 218
Thanked 179 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: School me on SS427s!

Correct, Diego. The SS427 was an option only on 67 Impala Super Sports model #s 16887/16867. In 68 and 69 the Super Sport and SS427 were options on the Impala all having the same model numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-24-2009, 05:37 AM
markjohnson's Avatar
markjohnson markjohnson is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL, MO.
Posts: 2,480
Thanks: 254
Thanked 568 Times in 229 Posts
Default Re: School me on SS427s!

Diego, I wasn't presenting that website as absolute proof, I just thought you'd enjoy seeing the many pictures of those beautiful cars. I've just finished doing by own book research and yeah, looks like it wasn't it's own model like I had thought. It was just a option even though many people have called it it's own model.
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22
1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-24-2009, 05:57 AM
Donny Brass Donny Brass is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: St Clair Shores, MI
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: School me on SS427s!

then I blame Paul



Paul ran a 13.13 at 106 in that large barge..... just an Pure Stock oval port 427.
__________________
1966 Corvette L79 12.34 @ 109.45
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-24-2009, 06:47 AM
442w30 442w30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gabba Gabba Hey! NYC
Posts: 2,531
Thanks: 219
Thanked 148 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: School me on SS427s!

Mark, it's all good - no worries!

Donny, just cuz someone joined in and agreed doesn't mean you're wrong. Shouldn't we allow the opportunity for a counterpoint? Not trying to rub it in, but rather keep it as a dialogue to see what perspectives others have? It's a remarkably obscure car for a company that built a million similar models.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.