Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-17-2009, 12:13 AM
Smokey Smokey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Midwest usa
Posts: 379
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

For some reason I have Van Halen "Hot for Teacher" in my head. Don't know if its the drums that sounds like a cammed up motor or what.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-17-2009, 01:29 AM
Stefano Stefano is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 9,032
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1,066 Times in 406 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

These 427ci Automatics (Paddle Shifters) are really catching on. We have been working to clear the top of the engines of all the GM Spaghetti. [image][/image] [image][/image] [image][/image] [image][/image]
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook-->
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-26-2009, 08:21 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 404 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

Getting closer to the finished product.

Z0-6 427 engine.



Silver grille.


Attached Images
 
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-26-2009, 10:39 PM
MosportGreen66's Avatar
MosportGreen66 MosportGreen66 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 8,710
Thanks: 1,086
Thanked 1,021 Times in 456 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

Why no FAST intake? With a big cube LSx, you'd make more power with an upgraded intake.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-27-2009, 12:40 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

[ QUOTE ]
Why no FAST intake? With a big cube LSx, you'd make more power with an upgraded intake.

[/ QUOTE ]
Nope...gained 4hp (?) I think it was, but killed the TQ. The FAST intake is better suited to the big port (LS7) heads versus the cnc'd LS3 pieces on our 427...as with our bbc's, bigger (runners) are not always better.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-27-2009, 12:40 AM
Stefano Stefano is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 9,032
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1,066 Times in 406 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

The fast intake is good for more HP generally speaking, no doubt. We performed much of the R&D for this intake along with the Guys at Wegner Motorsports.

Our Stage II NA 600hp Nickey which Bob McClurg test drove still has the experimental intake on it.

Regarding Tom's engine, he had a specific goal in mind and we bested those numbers without the additional parts (over 550hp) and were able to focus on drivability.

His engine idles better than the stock 376ci and has incredible tq at 2,500rpm up to redline.
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook-->
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-27-2009, 12:41 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

Ha! We posted at the same time...
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-27-2009, 12:46 AM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 404 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

Geez...same here.


[ QUOTE ]
Why no FAST intake? With a big cube LSx, you'd make more power with an upgraded intake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually no.

Because so many of the modified tuner cars of the past, such as of the '02s, really were not "drivers" I stressed drivibility to my engine builder. Because he went conservative with the cam and heads, the FAST intake made less HP on the dyno. I wanted something my wife, who is not a car person, could drive and enjoy. The car, with the upgrades, idles at 650 RPM, nice smooth musclecar sound, has a ton of torque (560), and is not a PITA in traffic.

We did not know what to expect sound wise, as we had not heard the car with the 427. At MCACNs I started it several times to move it, and not only did the wife and I like the sound, but several others commented on the quite rumble. IMO, sort of sounds like our '69, nothing harsh, but you know there is something extra under the hood.

The Nickey crew did a great job building the car of my dreams, not only peformance wise, but the little things. As far as I know, my car was the first 2010 with a silver grille (Blue bowtie), and the engine Chevy orange. Both were well received, and I think at least the Silver grille will be showing up on a lot of cars before long.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-27-2009, 12:48 AM
Stefano Stefano is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 9,032
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1,066 Times in 406 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

Rob is exactly right. While many other shops are just bolting stuff together we are actually testing the various components both on the engine and chassis dynos.

You would be surprised at how many of the big name tunners/builders are using Wegner to CNC port their heads and copy the component list we use.

How many 427s were at SEMA? We drove all three of our to the MCACAN show along with the Twin Turbo and some of the other Nickey Cars.
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook-->
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-30-2009, 06:34 PM
Andy Andy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 403
Thanks: 149
Thanked 201 Times in 63 Posts
Default Re: 2010 Yenko/SC Camaro, update 11-12-2009

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why no FAST intake? With a big cube LSx, you'd make more power with an upgraded intake.

[/ QUOTE ]
Nope...gained 4hp (?) I think it was, but killed the TQ. The FAST intake is better suited to the big port (LS7) heads versus the cnc'd LS3 pieces on our 427...as with our bbc's, bigger (runners) are not always better.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rob, was the fast intake ported before it was installed? I have seen marginal gains from unported fast setups but ones that have been ported and retuned after the install I have seen huge gains. A local friend of mine with a heads/cam bolt on LS1 trans am picked up 33 rwhp and about 20 ft lbs going from a stock LS6 intake with a ported stock throttle body to a ported fast 92MM intake with matching fast 92MM throttle body.

Is there a victor jr or super victor type intake available now for LS3 heads? I know that these intakes have had pretty good results on LS1s. If they did and it worked well, it would be a much cheaper alternative to a ported fast setup.
__________________
Andy
1967 Camaro 406 4 speed
1969 C/10 383 5 speed
1969 D300 318 4 speed
1969 Super Bee 383 4 speed
1972 K/5 350 Turbo 350
1972 Duster 340 727
1974 'Cuda 340 4 speed
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.