Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Classified Section > Ebay & other seen ads section

Please note


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-13-2021, 01:19 AM
Pusher_Man Pusher_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: My Old KY Home
Posts: 390
Thanks: 45
Thanked 109 Times in 50 Posts
Default

From the research I did on these cars before, it is believed all of them were SS cars and had a very rare FQ rear (12 bolt 3.07 open).

Duer’s car is legit and a real gem, to say the least.

But, anybody that would swear on anything of these cars may be crazy.

Last edited by Pusher_Man; 04-13-2021 at 01:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-13-2021, 01:37 AM
67 Nova Boy's Avatar
67 Nova Boy 67 Nova Boy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lansdale, Pa.
Posts: 3,342
Thanks: 18,450
Thanked 355 Times in 257 Posts
Default

Not all L79's were SS cars. Reggie Jackson had a NON SS White Coupe. No Ideal where it is

now, but might be the 4th of 6 or more?

Dave
67 Nova Boy
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-13-2021, 02:23 AM
Pusher_Man Pusher_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: My Old KY Home
Posts: 390
Thanks: 45
Thanked 109 Times in 50 Posts
Default

In my opinion, the only way for a car to be considered for sure one of the approximate 6 would be if it had its born with engine. I believe Duer’s old car is the only one to have both its original engine and POP. As I said in another thread, it is known for there to be more ZI POPs than GM made, with none (I think) having a born with engine to go with them. There were a few of these that were known to have a non-L79 327 original block stamp (ZA I think?). This led some expert(s) to think GM stamped POPs ZI by mistake.

I know this sounds very unusual. Normally, POPs are very reliable, but there is evidence in this case that backs this up. There are other identifiers of a probable true L79 for these cars that I won’t disclose.

Again, in my opinion, could the other cars be true L79s? Yes, they could but without the original engine it could be argued by some that it could be a gamble.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-15-2021, 04:00 AM
jeffschevelle jeffschevelle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 363
Thanks: 2
Thanked 723 Times in 178 Posts
Default

Isn't the transmission code on the POP a Saginaw? I would have thought a Muncie would be mandatory equipment behind an L79?
__________________
Jeff Helms
65 Z16 Survivor
65 Z16 drag car
66 Chevelle L78 unrestored
67 Chevelle L78 unrestored
67 Camaro SS350 Survivor
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2021, 02:42 PM
cook_dw cook_dw is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,322
Thanks: 623
Thanked 1,490 Times in 610 Posts
Default

Not in 67 on the Chevy II's. There's a few similar configurations that were common on several that have surfaced and even a few that are suspect. All POP info on drivetrain pretty much match. ZI or ZA (suspect) all built around mid to end of June, all 12 bolt FQ - 3.07 open 12-bolt (327 Special Hi-Per)(except the Gold one I think), Saginaw trans, cast iron intakes with q-jet 4 barrels, and large balancer (some questionable ones have a small balancer). That's pretty much all there is to know to a degree outside of some internal data collecting I can't share.



The Turquoise one listed above (Jack Duer car) is hands down the nicest and well restored 67 Chevy II's known especially with born with drivetrain. Its the Chick Renn 68 Z of the 67 Chevy II world IMHO. Congrats to whoever buys it as its a special one indeed. The red one in the other listings is nice as well but there are few things that make me raise an eyebrow but still a great example of a 67 II.

One more thing. Here’s a link to all the cars being sold with a ton more photos.

https://nwhouseofhardtops.com/1967-l79-novas

Last edited by cook_dw; 04-15-2021 at 02:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-18-2021, 02:16 AM
Pusher_Man Pusher_Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: My Old KY Home
Posts: 390
Thanks: 45
Thanked 109 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Darrell is correct about the Saginaw. Like I’ve said before, these cars are an amazing conversation starter because of their oddities galore. The only thing I would add is that production did enter July as my car was 07A, which is a week later than the “claimed” red car being the last of the 6. Again, who knows?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.