Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-14-2018, 02:50 PM
novadude novadude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 739
Thanks: 3
Thanked 49 Times in 35 Posts
Default

I believe it was Grumpy that said that he'd have rather focused on campaigning the Nova in the Late-1960s, but GM was pushing the Camaro for marketing reasons. His opinion was that the Nova made a much better drag car due to weight distribution.

Look at the overhang on a 1969 Camaro ahead of the front wheels, and compare that to a '69 Nova. The Nova in profile almost looks like an early-60s altered wheelbase car compared to the Camaro.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-15-2018, 06:41 AM
racer67x racer67x is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 31
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 17 Posts
Default

I'm kinda partial towards tunnel rammed Nova's myself..lol
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to racer67x For This Useful Post:
AutoInsane (12-20-2018), cam69aro (12-16-2018), markinnaples (12-15-2018), YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY (12-19-2018)
  #23  
Old 12-15-2018, 12:39 PM
Mr. Chevy's Avatar
Mr. Chevy Mr. Chevy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 4,615
Thanks: 287
Thanked 704 Times in 347 Posts
Default

Cool looking Nova. Love the Rally package.

Rich
__________________
"This is Sheriff Buford T. Justice, I'm in pursuit of a black Trans Am, he is all mine so stay out of the way"
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-15-2018, 02:31 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,486 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default



The 1969 396/350 HP with 4 speed Nova SS has a curb weight of 3370 lbs.



The 1969 396/350 HP with 4 speed Camaro SS has a curb weight of 3642 lbs
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-19-2018, 05:05 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,092
Thanks: 715
Thanked 296 Times in 137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EZ Nova View Post
I've been thinking about this for a while now. I really think GM had the Nova as THE PERFORMANCE car after the Corvette back in these years. Even to the point of not letting employees/dealers know? GM was behind there "pony" car Camaro. But for there street-raced straight line performance car, I think they we backing the Nova's.

My take on this is, other than 427 COPO's, your could get basically the same top of the line L78's. Both the Camaro and Chevelle could get the 396/325Hp motor, but Nova it wasn't available. Also BB 396 and A/C? Both Camaro and Chevelle could get 396's with A/C, yet the Nova again NOT AVAILABLE. So now add to the fact that a L78 4 sp Nova is lighter than a L78 Camaro, just seems that GM was looking to keep their compact lightweight Nova and there true street brawler? I know a number of guys that bought these new back in '69/'70. And I do believe that they were actually faster than a local COPO 427 Chevelle that was running around at the time too. I know of a couple L78 Nova's that ran well back then. Headers, curved distributor, jetted carb and 7" slick. These would run consistent mid 11's.

These guys always told me back in the day, very very few L78 Camaro's could run with them. Funny story. A good friend of mine bought and race a new '69 L78 Nova. After doing well running 11.60's he had enough money for a new paint job. See even though were Canadian, he painted it "Stars and Stripes" and was quite well know as "The Stars and Stripes" Nova. Well car is still local, but the owner is going to finish it one day, type of deal and won't sell it back. So he bought another '72. It has a 502 in it and it's getting the Stars and Stripe paint in the next 2 years. He says he doesn't recall loing to a OEM style Camaro.

Thoughts????
I disagree, IMHO. I believe the reduced amount of options was driven by cost. GM would have to invest a chunk of engineering time, production line changes, inventory, etc... for a very limited sales base. The cost/benefit simply wasn't there, so they added the BB in '68 with 1 mild and 1 wild to appeal to a limited buyer pool and then added the A/T to the L78 in '69 & '70 to increase the buyer pool and perhaps NHRA cert. The fact that the Nova is lighter than the Camaro with good geometry was not the driving force - if anything it was the limiting force which is why there's no L72 COPO Nova....
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-20-2018, 05:10 AM
NorCam's Avatar
NorCam NorCam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,190
Thanks: 2,583
Thanked 3,399 Times in 1,242 Posts
Default

FWIW, the original owner of my 69 Z (Kym Miller) ran consistent times with the Camaro in S/S JA and did so for 8 straight years finally winning a Championship in 78'. He then setup a 70 Nova for the same class and took the winning drive line out of the Camaro in 1979 and dropped it into the 70 Nova, but never got the car to run as fast as the Camaro. Exact drive line, same tires, same everything thinking the lighter car would run quicker? Well it just didn't, and he said it had to be wind resistance and/or weight distribution as the Camaro was better on the track??? Just an interesting set of events.



__________________
I like solid lifter cars, big cams and cars w/ 3 pedals in them.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-20-2018, 12:51 PM
earntaz earntaz is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 4,620
Thanks: 6,842
Thanked 647 Times in 360 Posts
Default

I have had both ... but a Camaro is like a persons south end, everyone has one. Now on the other hand, a Nova ... just sayin' ... TAZ
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to earntaz For This Useful Post:
cwc (12-22-2018)
  #28  
Old 12-20-2018, 01:10 PM
x33rs x33rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 759
Thanks: 43
Thanked 417 Times in 238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by earntaz View Post
I have had both ... but a Camaro is like a persons south end, everyone has one. Now on the other hand, a Nova ... just sayin' ... TAZ
There's a good reason for that

On a more serious note, I've owned 3 Novas and several Camaros. I like both, but like many others, I've always viewed the Nova as the economy pony car with some muscle mixed in if optioned right, but never considered it the flagship of the muscle car era for GM. The Camaro was obviously more popular then and still is today, but I'd own another Nova if the right one came along.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-20-2018, 03:50 PM
earntaz earntaz is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 4,620
Thanks: 6,842
Thanked 647 Times in 360 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by x33rs View Post
There's a good reason for that

On a more serious note, I've owned 3 Novas and several Camaros. I like both, but like many others, I've always viewed the Nova as the economy pony car with some muscle mixed in if optioned right, but never considered it the flagship of the muscle car era for GM. The Camaro was obviously more popular then and still is today, but I'd own another Nova if the right one came along.
Totally agree ...
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.