|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interesting 1969 Camaro
4:10 in a 350 small block had to be a drag/street racer. The highway rpm's and gas mileage would really suck.
__________________
67 Z28, 67 RS/SS 396 Canadian, 73 Camaro Z28/LT Carolina Blue |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interesting 1969 Camaro
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mr70</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yes.
Wow,just $2.15 to upgrade to a 4.10 </div></div> Well, it's not an upgrade where they have to remove what is in there and replace it with 4.10's. They just chose a 4.10 rear end from the parts bin. It's not any more expensive to manufacture that ratio. The extra cost is more because of a change from what is standard than a production cost. Try and order an optional ratio today, and it's a big upcharge. Is that because it cost extra, or it screws with the corporate fuel mileage? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interesting 1969 Camaro
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: firstgenaddict</div><div class="ubbcode-body">did you look under the hood? Does it have a curved neck radiator? </div></div>
I'm not a Chevy guy, so my attention is attracted by other Bow Tie elements. |
|
|