Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2021, 12:08 AM
66cayne 66cayne is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 114
Thanks: 14
Thanked 47 Times in 26 Posts
Default Correct Fork, bellhousing, clutch for 1969 Camaro

I am having some trouble with my new clutch install. My install is an Muncie M21, '621' bellhousing and 11" clutch behind a 350 sbc. The fork I have for this is the ( 10.4 "in length). when installed it will not center the throwout bearing on the clutch diaphram fingers. After researching this problem I was advised that Chevy used two forks in '69 based on the clutch size/bellhousing used. Theey are: # 3892632 and # 14066235; Per the information I received, clutch fork # 14066235 (which measures 11" in length} was used with the '621' bellhousing and 11" clutch when installed on the higher horsepower 350s Camaros { like a 350/300 hp in an SS}. The # 3892632 fork was installed on other sbcs and ironically the 1969 Z28 as well. If anyone has can shed some clarity on this subject it would be much appreciated. Regards
Reply With Quote
Attachments - The Supercar Registry IMG_1051.jpg IMG_1050.jpg
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 11-03-2021, 01:09 AM
KevinW KevinW is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Millstone, NJ
Posts: 970
Thanks: 2
Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
Default

Hmm, it doesn't sound like the 14066235 (73-81) fork will work without modification based on this post: https://www.camaros.net/threads/clut...rewall.200119/

I went down and looked at my 621 bellhousing and fork destined for my 69 SS350 and measured the fork (no numbers on it ) and it measures 10 1/8". When looking down the center it does look aligned, but I hope it is the correct one! I bought it many decades ago!
Attached Images
  
__________________
69 SS 350 convertible (in peices)
69 327 convertible (driver)

Last edited by KevinW; 11-03-2021 at 01:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2021, 02:59 AM
66cayne 66cayne is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 114
Thanks: 14
Thanked 47 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Thanks, did you fully seat the fork on the ball stud for this picture?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2021, 03:05 AM
Too Many Projects's Avatar
Too Many Projects Too Many Projects is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Town of Troy, WI
Posts: 4,112
Thanks: 2,138
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,381 Posts
Default

Yes, the Z28 did get the 403 bell for 10.5 clutch and shorter fork.
Are you keeping the bearing centered on the fork ends, or pushing all the way back ? It needs to be balanced on the ends and the spring holds it there until the trans is installed and it rides on the input collar.
__________________
Mitch
1970 Chevelle SS
1966 Chevelle SS
1967 Camaro ss/rs
1938 Business coupe, street rod
2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-2021, 11:56 AM
KevinW KevinW is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Millstone, NJ
Posts: 970
Thanks: 2
Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66cayne View Post
Thanks, did you fully seat the fork on the ball stud for this picture?
Yes it is.
__________________
69 SS 350 convertible (in peices)
69 327 convertible (driver)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2021, 02:43 PM
Jonesy's Avatar
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 2,998
Thanks: 272
Thanked 698 Times in 441 Posts
Default

3892632 is the clutch fork for both 11" and 10.25" clutches

All the GM parts books verify this. There are not 2 different forks.
Both bellhousings, the 403 and 621 took the same fork.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-2021, 03:37 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 196
Thanked 2,130 Times in 666 Posts
Default

Was in the parts biz back in the day. Recall a few guys having problems with a release fork rubbing on the tunnel.

There was another part number for passenger car applications, 3860005.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2021, 06:30 PM
66cayne 66cayne is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 114
Thanks: 14
Thanked 47 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonesy View Post
3892632 is the clutch fork for both 11" and 10.25" clutches

All the GM parts books verify this. There are not 2 different forks.
Both bellhousings, the 403 and 621 took the same fork.
Thanks for the clarity fellows. Per your post and the pictures above I re-checked mine and it fits just as in the posted pics. I simply had it seated too deeply in the fork opening, not riding on the end of the fingers. My learning experience. Regards
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 66cayne For This Useful Post:
Too Many Projects (11-03-2021)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.