Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2006, 07:33 PM
Mr. T Mr. T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Spokane Valley, WA USA
Posts: 1,423
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Why no L35 in 1970?

Out of complete curiosity and continuing knowledge, why did Chevrolet drop RPO L35 in 1970, for the Camaro, Chevelle, Camino, and Nova? Haven't come across any info on this subject. Thanks.
__________________
Tony
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 10-30-2006, 08:30 PM
CamarosRus CamarosRus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Auburn,WA (between Sea&Tac)
Posts: 2,478
Thanks: 46
Thanked 76 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

Mr 70 and others at www.yenko.net might have an answer for you ?????
__________________
Chuck Sharin
[email protected]
Auburn,WA (30 miles South of Seattle)
70 Camaro R/S Z-28, L-78, R/S SS
69 Camaro COPO "recreation"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2006, 08:31 PM
CamarosRus CamarosRus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Auburn,WA (between Sea&Tac)
Posts: 2,478
Thanks: 46
Thanked 76 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

Duhhhhh, I obviously was not awake yet, and paying attention to WHAT site I was on...........
__________________
Chuck Sharin
[email protected]
Auburn,WA (30 miles South of Seattle)
70 Camaro R/S Z-28, L-78, R/S SS
69 Camaro COPO "recreation"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-30-2006, 09:23 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,092
Thanks: 715
Thanked 296 Times in 137 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

".... and then totally redeem yourself"
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-30-2006, 09:47 PM
Rixls6 Rixls6 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: between Chicago and Milwaukee, IL
Posts: 2,672
Thanks: 21
Thanked 117 Times in 42 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

My guess is that the LS3 was being offered in `70 as a 330 Horse 402, so it took the place of the L35, and gained 5 Horse.
Also now you could get this LS3 in a non-SS Chevelle, but not in the SS as the lowest horsepower engine was the 402/350 in the SS.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-30-2006, 10:00 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,053
Thanks: 14,872
Thanked 4,515 Times in 2,144 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

What Rix says is correct as I remember reading how GM had what they called their 'engine deproliferation program' before 1970 production, deleting as many similar suffixes as possible. . Inventory of so many different suffixes was a problem also keeping them all in the pipeline so if an engine was close to what they wanted, it was slated for production and the 'excess' suffix motors dropped. . Comparing how many total suffixes were offered between '69 & '70 should show a big difference. .

~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2006, 06:49 AM
Gregs396 Gregs396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pa.
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

The LS-3 didn't start until 1971, and it was a 300HP version in the Camaro. The 1970 had either the L-34, or the L-78 402.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2006, 06:22 PM
Mr. T Mr. T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Spokane Valley, WA USA
Posts: 1,423
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

Thanks for the replies guys. Yes, the LS3 did not become a BB RPO until 1971. Maybe adding the LS5 and LS6 to the RPO Chevelle/Camino engine list had something to do with dropping the L35, and Chevrolet thought they had enough engine variations for 1970. So, since you couldn't get the L35 in a Chevelle or El'Camino, you couldn't get it in a Camaro or Nova.
__________________
Tony
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-31-2006, 06:39 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,427
Thanks: 70
Thanked 2,524 Times in 1,150 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

Because in 1970,we saw the birth of these brand new engines:
*LS-3 402/330HP-Malibu & Monte Carlo
*LS-4 454/345HP-Passenger series
*LS-5 454/360 & 390HP-Corvette-Chevelle-Monte C. & Pass.
*LS-6 454/450HP-Chevelle
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-31-2006, 11:13 PM
Gregs396 Gregs396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pa.
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

Once again, there was NO LS-3 until 1971......
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.