Real or Memorex? - Page 2

**PeteLeathersac** · #11 08-22-2016, 07:06 PM

'

Subject VIN 124379N683498

Too much use of restored/correct but nothing of the important word...original?
Also, phrasing simple statements as questions isn't usually necessary when all is just?
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/burnout.gif[/img]
~ Pete

**black69** · #12 08-22-2016, 07:07 PM

I just called the owner over at Volo, I think it is a car worth looking into based on where it was aquired (someone that has real LS6s, hemi cudas, etc). Volo owns the car outright and its not a consignment. I would give it a thumbs up at 75%. Said it has good broach marks, and would send pics (I passed on that, figuring Roy would get himself).

It did have a black top, with white stripes. But a car like this needs a personal inspection. Some work was done on the subframe (maybe from bottoming out or jacking up), again another thing that would need inspection.

**rsinor** · #13 08-22-2016, 07:37 PM

Can someone tell me if dealer 575 in zone 5 is Feld Chevrolet. This is not a car I am even considering but a car a good friend of mine seems to be in love with, I'm trying to figure out if tis even worth the effort to get a good inspection.

Charlie - I agree with you.

**RPOLS3** · #14 08-22-2016, 07:40 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Charley Lillard</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The caution fan sticker and the 70.00 Chinese brake booster are enough for me to walk away. </div></div>

[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/haha.gif[/img] Said what I was thinking. Never understood why on supposedly/apparently thorough restorations these things happen.

**njsteve** · #15 08-22-2016, 07:43 PM

But it's a genuine CAUTION FAN sticker! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/grin.gif[/img]

**Mr70** · #16 08-22-2016, 07:58 PM

Nothing specific about that Camaro,but it's Volo & I have 10X more bad then good with them.
I'd run,not walk away Roy.

**napa68** · #17 08-22-2016, 11:36 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mr70</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nothing specific about that Camaro,but it's Volo & I have 10X more bad then good with them.
I'd run,not walk away Roy. </div></div>

Yup!

**Charley Lillard** · #18 08-23-2016, 01:56 AM

KurtS posted this on Camaros.net

Well, the delivered date is off cause someone screwed up when they made the repro docs.
IMO, restamped axle and trans.
No pad pic?

**Kurt S** · #19 08-23-2016, 02:51 AM

Thanks Charley.

**rsinor** · #20 08-23-2016, 02:42 PM

You guys are the best, I was able to find out the actual production date on the car per the GM records through NCRS. Turned out to be 9/11/69. kind of put a damper on the p-o-p in service date. Then the records show it would have to been a dealer trade because Feld was not the dealer who purchased it for sale from GM.

Again, thanks a million, I have advised my friend, <span style="font-weight: bold">you can lead a horse to the water but you can't make him drink. </span>