Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Classified Section > Ebay & other seen ads section

Please note


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2022, 04:02 AM
scuncio's Avatar
scuncio scuncio is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,449
Thanks: 2,392
Thanked 5,995 Times in 2,925 Posts
Default '67 Mustang Fastback Project, "Special Purpose Vehicle"

According to the Marti report, this car was ordered as a Special Purpose Vehicle...would this imply a car destined for media use? In any case its current condition is pretty far from its original trim...currently has a 390-6bbl/4-sp but was originally a 289 with a C4.

Link to 1967 Mustang Fastback Project Car auction









7F02C200660
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 03-08-2022, 03:22 PM
Fast67VelleN2O's Avatar
Fast67VelleN2O Fast67VelleN2O is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 4,099
Thanks: 7
Thanked 183 Times in 91 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scuncio View Post
According to the Marti report, this car was ordered as a Special Purpose Vehicle...would this imply a car destined for media use? In any case its current

A little late on the build date to be a media use vehicle. Also kinda late for a dealer demo all loaded up like that. You'd think it would have an earlier build date (beginning of production) for media use or dealer demo.
__________________
Day 2 is Life.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2022, 03:43 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,500
Thanks: 2,620
Thanked 4,492 Times in 1,247 Posts
Default

From a GM perspective - a vehicle assigned to headquarters or some other internal discipline could be anything: pool vehicle use, to replace another vehicle that had been expensed, or just to have around with that option content for general development.

It would be hard (or impossible) to say at this point.

K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-2022, 01:15 PM
A12pilot's Avatar
A12pilot A12pilot is offline
Yenko Advertising Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4,576 Times in 1,137 Posts
Default

Lots of good parts missing that are not easily found.

+Interior Decor Group is gone (seats and all associate trim, dash bezel, no pic or mention but overhead console should be there as it’s part of the package)

+Convenience Group is MIA as is the optional lower center console and this is a biggie on the 1967s. That group has four courtesy lights for Door Ajar, Seat Belts, Low Fuel, and Parking Brake. This car has A/C which puts them in the console (rare) rather than on the panel that is occupied by the center vents. Extremely rare to find and not cheap to replace and hopefully the harness is still there behind the dash and in the doors. This group was more common on Cougars than Mustangs.

+Deluxe wheel missing

+AM/FM radio missing

Ford’s description of Special Purpose Vehicle doesn’t mean much since it could mean an exec’s wife ordered it, dealer give-a-way, or some other Ford promotion. Neat, but not overly enticing unless it had some sort of weird options but this one doesn’t. All standard stuff. It’s too late in the 67 year to be any kind of a demonstrator for the 1968 year, and with that, those are usually bucked on July 4th (a dead give-a-way). A note too is the DSO which is Ford’s plant in Dearborn and in particular, it’s Transportation Office which also screams “Corporate Demo” meaning, just something the execs drove around in, aka, company car. Again, neat, but nothing of note to drive the car into the stratosphere.

Despite that……I like it!!!!!

Cheers
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-2022, 02:53 PM
tjs44 tjs44 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: long beach,ca
Posts: 907
Thanks: 3
Thanked 187 Times in 81 Posts
Default

2.79 rear gear for sure not a performance application.Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.