Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2019, 01:59 AM
NorCam's Avatar
NorCam NorCam is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,044
Thanks: 593
Thanked 544 Times in 316 Posts
Default Late 69 Camaro 10E Build Date vs Muncie Build Date

Guy's

I've committed to the purchase of a 69 Z/28 that was built 10E of 69. The engine stamp and diff align nicely with the car, and the broach marks are spot on. It has a semi legible block stamp in the rough cast that also matches the car. The transmission has what appears to be a legit VIN stamp and the only thing I am curious about is the oddly dated Muncie build stamp which is early for this car. Were the late cars (10E) known to come with transmissions built and stamped earlier than the later assembly build dates during this period.

Here are the details of the build.

Door Sticker VIN marked 11/69 with VIN ending N708XXX
Norwood Body # NOR161163 dated 10E
Engine Stamp V1021DZ Cast Date Unknown TBA
Trans Stamp P9K03A - VIN and fonts look good and last character and a box depressed under the font (deeper square box like depression unlike all the other fonts)
Diff Stamp BU 1028G1 (E under it and a stand alone 5 under the G which I've not seen before)

The VIN stamp appears good on the transmission and being a low mile car, it retains all original bolts with the data tag still on the side cover with TR bolts. I doubt it has ever been apart from the looks of it. The curious point to me is the July 3rd date which is over 90 days earlier than the cars actual build date. No docs but I'm assuming the car was built very early November. Anyone seen that spread before on a late built car?

Last 3 numbers of VIN edited out of photo's until I have possession of the car.

Thanks in advance for any info on the trans stamp...

Graeme











__________________
I love cars w/ 3 pedals.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2019, 03:28 AM
William William is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 1,576
Thanks: 31
Thanked 213 Times in 110 Posts
Default

When the quarter panel tooling for the 1970 Camaro failed, Norwood had to scramble to keep '69s in production. Exactly when this became known isn't clear. Through about 09A Z/28s mostly had June/July dated transmissions. Starting 09C, May dated transmissions show up. It appears that at some point, surplus Muncie transmissions were rounded up from other assembly plants and shipped to Norwood. I have another 10E Z/28 with the same date as yours; another has a trans dated May 7. Same for COPOs. Know of a 10A car with a May 23 trans.

Muncie still produced 1969 model year trans for Norwood [P9R; mostly October dates] but there are a few like yours with much earlier dates.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
HawkX66 (09-16-2019), NorCam (09-14-2019)
  #3  
Old 09-14-2019, 03:52 AM
NorCam's Avatar
NorCam NorCam is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,044
Thanks: 593
Thanked 544 Times in 316 Posts
Default

Thank you for that info William. You have a great wealth of information and I was hoping you would chime in. It is very much appreciated. Have you seen that 5 on the diff stamps before. I've seen the E stamp under the date codes but had no idea what the 5 meant?
__________________
I love cars w/ 3 pedals.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2019, 04:31 AM
carnut4life carnut4life is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Beacon, IA
Posts: 145
Thanks: 23
Thanked 45 Times in 20 Posts
Default

I have a friend with a 09E COPO with the protect-o-plate, his engine and rear were both assembled the third week of August but the transmission is stamped P9H23 which is 6/23/69.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2019, 04:36 AM
COPO COPO is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA & the Middle East
Posts: 2,588
Thanks: 32
Thanked 53 Times in 42 Posts
Default

Have seen late '69 rears with a "C" in front of the "BU"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-14-2019, 12:28 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 1,576
Thanks: 31
Thanked 213 Times in 110 Posts
Default

No idea on what the 5 means. First one I have seen.

The 'C' prefix on rear axles was added when production resumed early August '69. Possibly because it may cause service confusion, it appears the C was subsequently peened over on some axles [mostly CBU] .

More info here:

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=10375.0
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2019, 02:08 PM
rlw68's Avatar
rlw68 rlw68 is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 112
Thanks: 26
Thanked 28 Times in 15 Posts
Default

You could also check the casting dates on the trans side cover and tail housing.
__________________
Rob
1969 Camaro Z/28. Norwood 02D. Lemans Blue
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-15-2019, 06:00 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,364
Thanks: 1
Thanked 78 Times in 47 Posts
Default

I agree, no issues with that trans.
I bet if you clean to the left of the axle code, there's a C there.
Does it have a 480 distributor?
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kurt S For This Useful Post:
NorCam (09-15-2019)
  #9  
Old 09-15-2019, 12:45 PM
jl8z28 jl8z28 is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 4
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default

My 11A car is 708 also trans P 9 R 21 has a 2003 dist
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jl8z28 For This Useful Post:
NorCam (09-15-2019)
  #10  
Old 09-15-2019, 02:02 PM
NorCam's Avatar
NorCam NorCam is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,044
Thanks: 593
Thanked 544 Times in 316 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt S View Post
I agree, no issues with that trans.
I bet if you clean to the left of the axle code, there's a C there.
Does it have a 480 distributor?
No, it is missing the original distributor. It's the only thing I'll need to find in order for it to be complete and correct throughout. I'm assuming it should be an 1112003 casting from what I have leaned recently? Original cowl hood car as well. Has original smog, manifolds, pulleys, rad w/ tag, alt, carb, booster, master, jack, orig spare and all 5 original YH wheels. Rad was just re-cored and smog is off the car at the moment but going back on soon. I've got another 692 water pump for it also.

With that said, a few maintenance items were serviced over the years and will need some minor correcting, but car is very complete and very original throughout. One repaint in the 90's and has 49,000 original miles with all factory sheet metal. 3rd owner added NOS wheel opening moldings. Here's a few pics for now. I'll post more when I get it home and go through in the off season to correct some little things.













__________________
I love cars w/ 3 pedals.

Last edited by NorCam; 09-15-2019 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to NorCam For This Useful Post:
Damien (09-16-2019), HawkX66 (09-16-2019), m22mike (09-15-2019), William (09-15-2019), ZLP955 (09-16-2019)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.