Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2010, 11:38 PM
nuch_ss396 nuch_ss396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 1,713
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default A question of practicality

Hey guys!

Been away a long time............ Glad to be back.

I have a question for the group here. Currently there is an
ebay auction for a rough cast "Yenko" ZL-1 block with steel
liners (not installed). My question is over the practicality
of such an item.

This block evidently has had no machining done to it. So how
does one get an albeit rare item like this machined for crank
and main bearing caps, camshaft bore, cylinder head bolt hole
locations, as well as all other necessary milling, drilling
and tapping?

Can even a good machine shop handle all of the necessary
machine work required? I'm sure Tonawanda had jigs and fixtures
to facilitate proper alignment for all machining operations
back in the day.......

Lastly, anyone care to hazzard a quess as to how much it might
cost to bring this rough cast block to useful life?

Nuch
__________________
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 03-22-2010, 01:08 AM
BARRY BARRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: ACTON ONT CANADA
Posts: 1,198
Thanks: 7
Thanked 56 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

hi you would have to send it to kieth black and he would have to be set up to machine the block and if it has a factory core shift or porise block it still could be JUNK when you are all done buy a new block 4500-5200 is the way to go
__________________
Barry Allan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2010, 01:32 AM
markjohnson's Avatar
markjohnson markjohnson is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL, MO.
Posts: 2,423
Thanks: 197
Thanked 418 Times in 190 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

As neat as owning a rough, un-machined ZL-1 block sounds like, I would limit it's usefulness to being a 110 LB conversation piece ONLY. By trade, I am a Machinist and there are so many major and minor operations that need to be performed on that block that you'd be looking at a HUGE investment in time and money. You are right about Tonawanda and Winters Foundries having jigs and fixtures back then to perform all these operations. You'd have to have a VERY good, Machinist set all this up again just to do ONE block and if any of these machining steps get botched or something bad happens, you could consider the block junk. Heck, I consider myself very good at what I do but even I wouldn't want to tackle something of this magnitude! One more important point is that I can't help but think that something must be wrong for this block to still be floating around for 40 having avoided machining when it was new and for the next four decades. There's a possibility that it may not have even been heat-treated yet. It may have been inspected immediately after the casting process and deemed un-machineable due to core shift or core sand or slag in the casting.
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22
1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:18 AM
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LS Make'um Better Guy
Posts: 7,738
Thanks: 739
Thanked 652 Times in 196 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

[ QUOTE ]
As neat as owning a rough, un-machined ZL-1 block sounds like, I would limit it's usefulness to being a 110 LB conversation piece ONLY. By trade, I am a Machinist and there are so many major and minor operations that need to be performed on that block that you'd be looking at a HUGE investment in time and money. You are right about Tonawanda and Winters Foundries having jigs and fixtures back then to perform all these operations. You'd have to have a VERY good, Machinist set all this up again just to do ONE block and if any of these machining steps get botched or something bad happens, you could consider the block junk. Heck, I consider myself very good at what I do but even I wouldn't want to tackle something of this magnitude! One more important point is that I can't help but think that something must be wrong for this block to still be floating around for 40 having avoided machining when it was new and for the next four decades. There's a possibility that it may not have even been heat-treated yet. It may have been inspected immediately after the casting process and deemed un-machineable due to core shift or core sand or slag in the casting.

[/ QUOTE ]


"Bingo"................ .....Even if you found someone to machine the block.....I'm sure the cost would be much more than a "New" GM aluminum block....

Ken
__________________


The Best things in life......Aren't Things
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-22-2010, 03:14 AM
Smokey Smokey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Midwest usa
Posts: 379
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

I'm wondering why it didn't get machined 40 years ago. If I was a betting man, I would put money on it that they thought it was a junk casting back then...and made it into a scrap pile or the back end of someones truck.

They didn't let good casting cores slide through the cracks that easy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2010, 09:01 AM
nuch_ss396 nuch_ss396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 1,713
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

I've probably seen six or more of these "un-machined" rough
castings over the past 5-6 years. I tend to agree with the
suggestion that these blocks may actually be less-than-worthy;
which is why they exist in their un-machined states.

I would actually like to know the final tally if someone did
attempt/succeed with finish machining one of these.....

So is this item destined to be in a ZL-1 tribute somewhere?

Nuch
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2010, 03:08 PM
old5.0's Avatar
old5.0 old5.0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 921
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

I'd buy it for the story. World's coolest coffee table.
__________________
98 Cobra. Long tubes. Big cams. Shifter. 4.88s. Still slow.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-22-2010, 06:17 PM
ANDY M's Avatar
ANDY M ANDY M is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,007
Thanks: 57
Thanked 38 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

It was well known in Ohio that a number of "red tagged" blocks went over the back fence. They were machined in Delaware OH, and there are still some of these blocks floating around here. Listen to Mark and Ken.
They were tagged for a good reason.
__________________

COPO 9561/9737 M40 X11D80
13.37 @ 105.50 on pump gas,drove it to NATL TRAILS and back [email protected] SCR22
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-22-2010, 09:36 PM
m22mike's Avatar
m22mike m22mike is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West of CAK
Posts: 5,001
Thanks: 766
Thanked 830 Times in 398 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

Some of the good ol' Canton boys here still talk about "Free" heads and intakes from the foundry. So who knows about those blocks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-22-2010, 11:51 PM
firez firez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: A question of practicality

I seen a 1969 302 block rough cast block last year at a local swap meet. Never seen one before that Sure are a rough looking unit before machining
__________________
1968 LOS Rallye Green Z28
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.