Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2021, 05:51 AM
AnthonyS's Avatar
AnthonyS AnthonyS is offline
Yenko Advertising Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,056
Thanks: 123
Thanked 607 Times in 366 Posts
Default calling 1969 Camaro Z/28 19L554152 - I found your block!

Hi Gang,

Listing this here for the owner of the car first.

I will list for sale with a proper sales ad after I take some more photos / don't hear from the owner of VIN 124379L554152

Would like to see them reunited first. I've also cross posted in the Orphans Thread here.

3956618 casting - cast date of February 3 1969 stamped V0207DZ

Standard bore still!

Cheers all,
Anthony
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
Attachments - The Supercar Registry IMG_2698.jpg IMG_2697.jpg IMG_2696.jpg full-4703-57033-full_4703_35111_007.jpg
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 07-17-2021, 06:48 AM
WorkinProgress WorkinProgress is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Constitution State
Posts: 506
Thanks: 38
Thanked 193 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Going to be tough to match this block up. LOS VINs only went as high as 9L531163.

A February stamped block would have a VIN 9L52XXXX.

Maybe just the second digit in the VIN is messed up.

- Warren
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WorkinProgress For This Useful Post:
AnthonyS (07-17-2021)
  #3  
Old 07-17-2021, 07:11 AM
AnthonyS's Avatar
AnthonyS AnthonyS is offline
Yenko Advertising Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,056
Thanks: 123
Thanked 607 Times in 366 Posts
Default

RUH ROH!!

I do see that now after a quick Google-ing...

So, what does everyone think? This a fugazi stamping or an error - I gotta admit, if spurious, it fooled me!

Thoughts?!

And THANKS Warren!

Cheers,
Anthony
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2021, 07:17 AM
AnthonyS's Avatar
AnthonyS AnthonyS is offline
Yenko Advertising Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,056
Thanks: 123
Thanked 607 Times in 366 Posts
Default

a mirror image 5 might look like a 2 in a gang stamp holder after hitting 65 of them in an eight hour shift... could the second "5" be in place of a correct "2"?

either way... let's hear theories and or comments on the pad / stamping before I abandon this.

Thanks again, in advance all.
Anthony
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2021, 12:18 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 197
Thanked 2,130 Times in 666 Posts
Default

That's one of two known block VIN stamp anomalies at Van Nuys February/March 69. VIN on the chassis would have been 124379L524152.

Not in the db, does not come up on a Google search.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
69M22Z (07-17-2021), AnthonyS (07-17-2021), fortim (07-17-2021), fsc66 (07-21-2021), GotGrunt (07-17-2021), PeteLeathersac (07-19-2021), Steve Shauger (07-18-2021), SuperNovaSS (07-17-2021)
  #6  
Old 07-17-2021, 02:57 PM
Unreal Unreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 1
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Once again, William to the rescue! Where else, but this site, could you get that kind of specific knowledge.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-17-2021, 04:07 PM
fiveforty fiveforty is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Goffstown N.H.
Posts: 276
Thanks: 1
Thanked 78 Times in 32 Posts
Default

This car was missing original block but would have luved to see the stamp. 9L526889. Car was built March 17th.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-19-2021, 06:21 PM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 2
Thanked 603 Times in 298 Posts
Default

I know of five other blocks with that misstamp.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-19-2021, 08:24 PM
AnthonyS's Avatar
AnthonyS AnthonyS is offline
Yenko Advertising Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,056
Thanks: 123
Thanked 607 Times in 366 Posts
Default

Interesting, thanks Kurt, as in, they are "554" when they should've been "524"?

Makes sense, as I assume it wouldn't have been noticed right away, even though it 'should've been'...

Either way Gang, I don't own this block anymore; thanks for all the messages about it!

Cheers everyone,
Anthony
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.