Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > L78/L89 specific Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-01-2017, 08:44 PM
fsc66 fsc66 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 848
Thanks: 131
Thanked 387 Times in 180 Posts
Default 1968 Engine/Trans Production

1968 Chevy II: 667

3-spd manual - 52
4-spd manual - 615


1968 Camaro 4575

3-spd manual - 27
4-spd manual - 4548

Paul Winvoices
__________________
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-01-2017, 09:28 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 196
Thanked 2,130 Times in 666 Posts
Default

1969 Camaro production figures can be found in the book "Tailfins & Bowties." The data was obtained directly from Chevrolet in the ‘80s and reprinted in the book. All of the oft-repeated ’69 Camaro production numbers came from this data.

The data lists 1969 Camaro production by engine size; 230, 250, 327 et cetera. No 427 engine is listed but the figures total 243,085, same as 1969 production. COPO 9560 [ZL1] & 9561 [L72] build records always list L78 for some reason but not Z27 [Camaro SS].

Ergo, both COPO 427 options are included in the L78 totals.

The L48 [300/350] was the standard Camaro SS engine; 22,339 built. Camaro SS optional 396 engines; 13,659 built. Data shows 34,932 Camaro SS produced. Adding L48 and 396 totals, 22,339 + 13,659 = 35,998.

That’s 1,066 more than Camaro SS.

There were 69 COPO 9560 Camaros built; 1,066 – 69 = 997 COPO 9561 cars. That means the L78 total of 4,889 is inflated. Actual L78 production would be 3,823.

Just for the record, L89 was not an engine option. It was an aluminum cylinder head option that required ordering the L78 engine. Factory docs for those cars always list both. The L78 total includes the 311 L89 cars.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
442w30 (07-02-2017), COPO (07-08-2017)
  #13  
Old 07-19-2017, 07:02 AM
firstgenaddict's Avatar
firstgenaddict firstgenaddict is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 161
Thanked 942 Times in 457 Posts
Default

I had stated for quite some time I had believed the L78 total for 69 to include the 9560 and 9561 programs as they were ordered as L78's to get the suspension then had a substitution list.
__________________
~JAG~
NCRS#65120
68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car
#21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built.
71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist.
NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros,
Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes
& a Chevelle or two...
Survivors, restored cars, & other photos
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-19-2017, 11:21 AM
bbbentley's Avatar
bbbentley bbbentley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Close to the old Norwood plant in Ohio
Posts: 2,264
Thanks: 452
Thanked 490 Times in 237 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstgenaddict View Post
I had stated for quite some time I had believed the L78 total for 69 to include the 9560 and 9561 programs as they were ordered as L78's to get the suspension then had a substitution list.
How would the L78 suspension be different than the L34-L35 optioned cars? Would not all big block cars share the same suspension parts? The only difference between any BB 69 Camaro that I am aware of, is the L78 single fuel line vs the q-jet variants have 2 lines. Your inference is that the L78 has a unique suspension, right?
__________________

69 SS/RS 396 M20 X22 Nor 12B,72B,712 bought 1979
FULL OWNER HISTORY
69 Dick Harrell tribute Day II 427 M20 4.10 X11 76 orig pnt, 711
67 Super Stock 302 Camaro re-creation

Last edited by bbbentley; 07-19-2017 at 11:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-20-2017, 12:40 AM
scuncio's Avatar
scuncio scuncio is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,437
Thanks: 2,389
Thanked 5,976 Times in 2,915 Posts
Default

Maybe lighter spring rate due to aluminum intake? Personally I think it was driven by the single 3/8 fuel line and throttle linkage due to the common Holley carb between L78 and L72.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-20-2017, 01:57 AM
WILMASBOYL78's Avatar
WILMASBOYL78 WILMASBOYL78 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: new york
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,604 Times in 494 Posts
Post 1968 L78 Nova production..

It has always been my understanding that there were 617 manual trans L78 cars [I assume most were 4spd] and there were 50 TH400 Gibb COPO cars...total run 667. Those numbers have been pretty well known in the hobby.

-wilma



Quote:
Originally Posted by fsc66 View Post
1968 Chevy II: 667

3-spd manual - 52
4-spd manual - 615


1968 Camaro 4575

3-spd manual - 27
4-spd manual - 4548

Paul Winvoices
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95
Lots of L78 Novas
Join National Nostalgic Nova!
70 Orange Cooler
69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.