Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2019, 06:16 PM
Fast67VelleN2O's Avatar
Fast67VelleN2O Fast67VelleN2O is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mullica Hill, NJ
Posts: 4,099
Thanks: 7
Thanked 183 Times in 91 Posts
Default 2 Different Vins.... one 1969 Muncie Transmission

Now this is a new one for me. Bought this greasy thing that's been sitting for decades.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Day 2 is Life.
Reply With Quote
Attachments - The Supercar Registry muncie.jpg Inkedtransmission double stamp_LI.jpg 67 350 21.png 67 350 19.jpg
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 03-09-2019, 06:29 PM
muscle_collector muscle_collector is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 538
Thanks: 357
Thanked 717 Times in 194 Posts
Default

ive actually had a couple of them like that. first one I saw was around 81 and I pulled it out of a firebird that was in a salvage yard. no body was restamping anything like that back then especially to put in a plain firebird. always wandered why.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2019, 09:39 PM
ZLP955's Avatar
ZLP955 ZLP955 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,180
Thanks: 751
Thanked 253 Times in 182 Posts
Default

Second partial probably added at the same time someone put the 'E' after the factory M21 assembly stamp.
__________________
Tim in NSW, Australia
1969 Van Nuys 04A Z/28 from Clippinger Chevrolet.
Cortez Silver with dark blue interior.
Ran at Lions Dragstrip and Pomona Raceway, with paint by Bob Kovacs of Fresno.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2019, 10:21 PM
rszmjt rszmjt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Calgary,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 263
Thanks: 5
Thanked 117 Times in 77 Posts
Default

The 9N558896 2 is a really bad restamp , individual hand stamped. LOL even has too many characters.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2019, 12:28 AM
SS69chevelle SS69chevelle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 221
Thanks: 1
Thanked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Default

the chevelle vin is a 06B build, the first B looks like it might have been an E at some point which would fit better for a june chevelle build but i guess anything is possible. thanks for posting.
__________________
Andy
Team Chevelle #3135
ACES #08305
1969 Chevelle Trim Tag Research (On-going)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2019, 03:38 AM
SuperNovaSS SuperNovaSS is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 6,460
Thanks: 316
Thanked 619 Times in 323 Posts
Default

Crazy Matt. Thanks for sharing.

Rszmjt,

What do you mean by too many characters?

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2019, 05:40 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,493
Thanks: 2,613
Thanked 4,475 Times in 1,242 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rszmjt View Post
The 9N558896 2 is a really bad restamp , individual hand stamped. LOL even has too many characters.
Not only that - but it would be impossible for the same transmission to be installed originally at two different assembly plants (Baltimore and Norwood).

K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Keith Seymore For This Useful Post:
69LM1 (03-11-2019), PeteLeathersac (03-11-2019)
  #8  
Old 03-12-2019, 03:19 AM
bbjohnny bbjohnny is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 127
Thanks: 37
Thanked 33 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Here's an interesting 68 transmission. Sorry for the editing. Not mine!!
Attached Images
 

Last edited by bbjohnny; 03-12-2019 at 03:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2019, 04:26 AM
Schonyenko2 Schonyenko2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Donahue, Ia. USA
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 93
Thanked 98 Times in 54 Posts
Default

I wonder if possibly it was a re work piece. I've had blocks that had nbrs that didn't match up with the cast dates. Bad pieces weren't fixed on the line and replaced on the car. Our bad parts went to the re work area, and they got to it whenever.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2019, 04:54 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,963
Thanks: 2
Thanked 601 Times in 296 Posts
Default

That's what I'm thinking - rework. Parts were returned to the source plant for repair.

That NOR stamp was hit at an angle. I have others like it.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.