View Single Post
  #14  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:27 AM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,557
Thanks: 381
Thanked 389 Times in 166 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

[ QUOTE ]
It does only if it has a certified LM1.

[/ QUOTE ]

Now Dr. Seuss, why do I fee like this is the Star-Belly Sneetches discussion?

I know what I've got and I am happy with it. Which was my point. Who would'nt be happy with that vette this thread is about?

Finally, I'll never understand how a Deuce with a LT1 (which was the exact same engine in my 70 Z) is considered a "supercar" and a L78 is not. If the criteria is ET times, than how is the L78 "just" a camaro and the 1980ish Yenko "turbo"Z a "supercar"?
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"
Reply With Quote