Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:27 AM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,557
Thanks: 382
Thanked 389 Times in 166 Posts
Default Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?

[ QUOTE ]
It does only if it has a certified LM1.

[/ QUOTE ]

Now Dr. Seuss, why do I fee like this is the Star-Belly Sneetches discussion?

I know what I've got and I am happy with it. Which was my point. Who would'nt be happy with that vette this thread is about?

Finally, I'll never understand how a Deuce with a LT1 (which was the exact same engine in my 70 Z) is considered a "supercar" and a L78 is not. If the criteria is ET times, than how is the L78 "just" a camaro and the 1980ish Yenko "turbo"Z a "supercar"?
__________________
Rich Pern
69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier"
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.