Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2010, 10:35 PM
Late BrakeU2 Late BrakeU2 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Malibu CA.
Posts: 1,118
Thanks: 9
Thanked 103 Times in 53 Posts
Default Re: 1971 LS6 Chevelle SS Production

It's well documented the first LS6 pre production cars were converted 396's,of those dedicated for eval and buff mag articles all went to the crusher- because they were not DOT or emissions certified.

I think we all want to believe in cars of this mystique- how many have actually been found?. Where's the Z16 vert?. Urban legend is great fodder for discussion- but until you get undisputed proof..i'm from Cali via Missouri

Buff mag articles like the Bill Clements L89/LS6, and this one are just irresponsible journalisim IMO. They perpetuate the myth, just like that Reggie ZL1 rebody at BJ last year.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2010, 10:43 PM
Tracker1's Avatar
Tracker1 Tracker1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 3,366
Thanks: 923
Thanked 980 Times in 469 Posts
Default Re: 1971 LS6 Chevelle SS Production

[ QUOTE ]
It's well documented the first LS6 pre production cars were converted 396's,of those dedicated for eval and buff mag articles all went to the crusher- because they were not DOT or emissions certified.

I think we all want to believe in cars of this mystique- how many have actually been found?. Where's the Z16 vert?. Urban legend is great fodder for discussion- but until you get undisputed proof..i'm from Cali via Missouri

Buff mag articles like the Bill Clements L89/LS6, and this one are just irresponsible journalisim IMO. They perpetuate the myth, just like that Reggie ZL1 rebody at BJ last year.

[/ QUOTE ]

I totally agree that the August 1995 article you are referring to on Bill Clements fake aluminum-headed LS6 vert was irresponsible.

But the article I attached is an original road test from 1971. The magazine was simply testing and reporting on something they were told would be available on that day. It's not their fault a change of plans may have happened a month or two later.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.