Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#641
06-04-2015, 02:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
|
#642
06-04-2015, 03:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Nice Chevelle!! Would those headers be of the "180 degree" type? I think that's what they're called anyway??!!
__________________
I ain't as good as I once was, but I'm as good once as I ever was.
|
|
#643
06-04-2015, 07:17 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
|
#644
06-04-2015, 01:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Posted before, but these lastest pics got my blood hot! I think we have a new(old) trend.
 
__________________
1968 Z/28 34,000 mile, born with engine and trans, Shipper, California car, Fathom Blue, deluxe interior, M21, 3.55 Posi 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire, Factory all Aluminum V8 Turbocharged and Methanol Injected TURBO ROCKET engine, 4 speed Hydramatic, 4 link rear suspension, 3.36 differential, California car, PS, PB, PW, AC, Jetfire 2 option package.
|
|
#645
06-04-2015, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hemicolt</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tracker1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
 </div></div>That's on kill. </div></div>
__________________
-Kelly Burns
|
|
#646
06-04-2015, 04:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is "stance" important?
 
__________________
1968 Z/28 34,000 mile, born with engine and trans, Shipper, California car, Fathom Blue, deluxe interior, M21, 3.55 Posi 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire, Factory all Aluminum V8 Turbocharged and Methanol Injected TURBO ROCKET engine, 4 speed Hydramatic, 4 link rear suspension, 3.36 differential, California car, PS, PB, PW, AC, Jetfire 2 option package.
|
|
#649
06-23-2015, 04:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Classic. Never get tired looking at the 63-67's............
__________________
Jersey Jeff 69 Day-2 L89 T400 BX 2015 ZL-1 Auto 98 Surburban
|
|
#650
06-23-2015, 06:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Fast67VelleN2O</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ask anyone under the age of 25 what "stance" is today and this is what they would show you.
</div></div> I disagree at the age of 15. This is what I like: (This car is actually the way I fell in love with the street machine look) 
__________________
My cars, passed down by my grandfather: '68 Camaro SS (454/TH400, possible L78/M22) LeMans Blue, black deluxe interior, black vinyl top. 3.73- mostly Day 2. '89 Mustang GT- 3.55, subframe connectors, muffler delete, and a couple other minor mods. Exactly as he wanted it, so how it shall stay Also: 1995 Ford F-150 XL 2004 Dodge Ram Hemi GTX- #192 of 433 Ain't no fun in viewing your car as an 'investment'. Get out there and beat on it!
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
