![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dang - love the a** end of a '70 Chally and the butt stripe doesn't hurt at all!!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img]
__________________
Sam... ![]() |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interior shots? - console car right (C55)?
__________________
Sam... ![]() |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Much needed pictures, that's a great car! I would love to have it!!
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is that 23 thousand actual miles?
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, that is a great car! If it was local I would be all over it. It is in Texas correct?
Is paint original? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hum...I thought all 70-71 challengers had to lose the rear exhaust out the rear valance for use in California, and had to run drop downs right behind the panel. I have seen 2 hemi cuda's that way for 70, maybe its just a hemi rule.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It may have been due to the Cuda's cutouts being up, in the valance? The Challenger's tips were technically below the valance.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: njsteve</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It may have been due to the Cuda's cutouts being up, in the valance? The Challenger's tips were technically below the valance. </div></div>
thanks..that has to be it. Its a cuda thing. |