Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Lounge


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:30 PM
southernfriedcj's Avatar
southernfriedcj southernfriedcj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,089
Thanks: 213
Thanked 492 Times in 228 Posts
Default

I appreciate all the replies. That explains why I have never run across any assembly line wet sand/buff pictures.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70 copo View Post
OP

Give me a date range of interest please.
Basically I have always been curious.

What caused the thread was I have purchased a '69 Firebird and when I get around to the restomod I want to paint it Verdoro Green. I would like it to look like a 1969 paint job.
I see a lot of restored cars that just don't seem to look like they did back in the day and I was wondering if it may be the paint finish(and radial tires) that throw off the look.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-19-2019, 11:39 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,240 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southernfriedcj View Post
I appreciate all the replies. That explains why I have never run across any assembly line wet sand/buff pictures.



Basically I have always been curious.

What caused the thread was I have purchased a '69 Firebird and when I get around to the restomod I want to paint it Verdoro Green. I would like it to look like a 1969 paint job.
I see a lot of restored cars that just don't seem to look like they did back in the day and I was wondering if it may be the paint finish(and radial tires) that throw off the look.
Gotcha! Assuming your Firebird is a Norwood Build then as an example the order was expressed as:

-Second undercoat and Prime
-Bake
-Wet sanding/Buff
-First finish coat
-Bake
-Second Finish Coat
-Bake
-Polish

(Echoes of Norwood page 96 (GM/FB paint process order flow chart)

BUT: the process changed again slightly with the phase in of ELPO and the use of the 50,000 gallon electrostatic prime system

In the Pre Elpo era of sprayed undercoat and prime, Buffing was done primarily to remove dirt from the undercoat prior to the first paint coat.

After the phase in of ELPO primer the paint process featured the addition of buffing before the final reflow oven. After the reflow oven the unit went to the polish station as normal.


The car could also be sanded and buffed again in a final step at an area called Automotive General Repair (AGR).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 70 copo For This Useful Post:
southernfriedcj (06-20-2019)
  #3  
Old 06-20-2019, 11:17 AM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,675
Thanks: 2,717
Thanked 5,008 Times in 1,377 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70 copo View Post
Gotcha! Assuming your Firebird is a Norwood Build then as an example the order was expressed as:

-Second undercoat and Prime
-Bake
-Wet sanding/Buff
-First finish coat
-Bake
-Second Finish Coat
-Bake
-Polish

(Echoes of Norwood page 96 (GM/FB paint process order flow chart)

BUT: the process changed again slightly with the phase in of ELPO and the use of the 50,000 gallon electrostatic prime system

In the Pre Elpo era of sprayed undercoat and prime, Buffing was done primarily to remove dirt from the undercoat prior to the first paint coat.

After the phase in of ELPO primer the paint process featured the addition of buffing before the final reflow oven. After the reflow oven the unit went to the polish station as normal.


The car could also be sanded and buffed again in a final step at an area called Automotive General Repair (AGR).
You have reminded me: In the truck world we did do a light scuff of the ELPO and then wipe with a tack rag but it was to promote adhesion of the color coat as much as anything else.

K

http://www.73-87.com/7387info/Assembly%20Line.htm
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph best

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 06-20-2019 at 12:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2019, 02:39 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,240 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
You have reminded me: In the truck world we did do a light scuff of the ELPO and then wipe with a tack rag but it was to promote adhesion of the color coat as much as anything else.

K

http://www.73-87.com/7387info/Assembly%20Line.htm
Oh yea!

Big signs along the line warning everyone not to touch the units too. ELPO was very sensitive to any foreign matter for the purposes of adhesion control.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2019, 01:35 AM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,675
Thanks: 2,717
Thanked 5,008 Times in 1,377 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southernfriedcj View Post
I would like it to look like a 1969 paint job.
.
Just take a look at an original unrestored car.

You might change your mind about that.

K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph best
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Keith Seymore For This Useful Post:
southernfriedcj (06-20-2019)
  #6  
Old 06-20-2019, 01:59 AM
southernfriedcj's Avatar
southernfriedcj southernfriedcj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,089
Thanks: 213
Thanked 492 Times in 228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
Just take a look at an original unrestored car.

You might change your mind about that.

K
Not a 50 year old 1969 paint job. A brand new 1969 paint job.

It will probably look like a 1929 paint job because I'll shoot it in my garage.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-21-2019, 03:32 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,675
Thanks: 2,717
Thanked 5,008 Times in 1,377 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southernfriedcj View Post
I would like it to look like a 1969 paint job.
Like this?

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=155503

K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph best
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:00 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,542 Times in 22,784 Posts
Default



Chrysler charged extra for buffed Silver Metallic on it's cars during the middle to late 1960s. That was the only "standard" color that was buffed and had a cost to it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lee Stewart For This Useful Post:
southernfriedcj (06-20-2019)
  #9  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:04 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,542 Times in 22,784 Posts
Default



Chevy charged extra for Sebring Silver on the 1963 Corvette - I assume it was because it was buffed (though I may be wrong)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:57 PM
Canuck's Avatar
Canuck Canuck is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,922
Thanks: 245
Thanked 756 Times in 250 Posts
Default

Most dealers just applied Polyglycoat
__________________
1971 W30 convert, triple green,second owner.
1971 W30 Convert, special order Rally red, completed
68 Camaro Z28,Corvette Bronze,Houndstooth
2016 Porsche Carerra Cab and 2021 C63S AMG ,modern fun.
www.vancouverclassiccars.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canuck For This Useful Post:
southernfriedcj (06-20-2019)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.