Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Other Muscle


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2006, 08:36 AM
yellowjudge yellowjudge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

Hey this is "other muscle" Pontiac can take center stage here! Love that 69 blue RAIV Don.!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2006, 03:14 PM
flyingn's Avatar
flyingn flyingn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cinnaminson , NJ
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 5,945
Thanked 645 Times in 258 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

hey Don, is that baby coming out this summer? Can't wait to see it..

Frank
__________________
Frank Szymkowski

1987 Mustang GT convertible, scarlet red/titanium, white top and white/red leather, 5 speed, 3.08, factory EQ

1969 GTO Judge Warwick blue/blue, RAIII, 4 speed, tach/gauges, safe t track, flip headlights, 3.55's, ps and radio.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2006, 05:45 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 360 Times in 144 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

While the mighty ram IV is burning stuff, the schmenko will be toastin on down the track - just 'Humblin' another one
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2006, 06:21 PM
Supercar_Kid Supercar_Kid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

Can anyone give me a legitimate answer to this power brakes question?

It doesn't make any sense to me why you couldn't order a small block 300HP SS Camaro in '69 unless you got power discs in front, but a much heavier 455 powered GTO only needed the standard 4 wheel manual drums in '70? How about other GM lines...were power discs a mandatory option included in the Buick GS package, how about Olds 442? Was it only Chevy that mandated the power disc option in conjuction with it's 69 and newer high perf packages like SS and Z/28?

When GM made "rules" they typically went across the board...no larger than 400 cubes in a mid size car pre-70, a locking steering column was adopted across all of the GM line in '69...and at Chevrolet power brakes were required with Super Sport or Z/28 simple as that, but not anywhere else?

I agree it was a smart safety concern, but it just doesn't seem to make any sense why power brakes were a must have on Chevrolets but not on Pontiacs?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2006, 07:16 PM
GTO_DON GTO_DON is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,072
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

BOY YOUR REALLY HELL BENT ON THIS QUESTION ARENT YOU? ITS A SIMPLE FACT. THE GM AT CHEVY BELIEVED THAT ALL SS CARS SHOULD BE EQUIPPED WITH DISC BRAKES AS STANDARD EQUIPMENT AND THE GM OVER AT PONTIAC DIDNT BELIEVE SO. ITS THAT SIMPLE! ALOT OF DRAG RACERS WOULD RATHER THEIR CAR HAD DRUM BRAKES [LESS FRICTION]
__________________
1970 GTO JUDGE RAM IV 23,000 miles
1969 GTO convert RAM AIR 4spd
1964 GTO convert survivor
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2006, 10:00 PM
Xplantdad's Avatar
Xplantdad Xplantdad is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 32,497
Thanks: 7,599
Thanked 5,814 Times in 1,994 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone give me a legitimate answer to this power brakes question?


[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Supercar Kid...This is Tim's response:

[ QUOTE ]
I may have this one wrong, but as I recall, Chevrolet Division had the "lead" in developing disc brakes so they would have had 1st shot at usage.
In those days, GM had what was called an "Orange Book" that outlined which Car Division had "design responsibility" for given components. Possibly someone in your forum has a copy of this document - - it would be very interesting to read it now.

The disc brake and wheel width transitions in 1969/1970 were confusing.
Option proliferation was driving the plants crazy and the performance era was adding significant end items to final assembly. There was also the "low advertised price" culture at the time. Muscle cars were competing for baby boomers' first pay checks - - even common sense options were not made standard (like brake/wheel upgrades, gage packages, power steering, "heater cars," and steering wheels).

One other thought, but only speculation. Often there were capacity constraints, especially with emerging new options(idling drum brake capacity and bringing-up disc brake capacity without losing total capacity). Even UAW got involved with different plants going down/up in employees. The Division GMs fought for the scarce options and the deciding vote was usually based on a volume consideration - - they did not want to over-extend applications so they would have sufficient supply for what they called "free expression" demand for any given application.

Terrific clip of your car. I like the front-end lift when you launched.

[/ QUOTE ]
__________________
Bruce
Choose Life-Donate!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-02-2006, 01:11 AM
Supercar_Kid Supercar_Kid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

[ QUOTE ]
ITS A SIMPLE FACT. THE GM AT CHEVY BELIEVED THAT ALL SS CARS SHOULD BE EQUIPPED WITH DISC BRAKES AS STANDARD EQUIPMENT AND THE GM OVER AT PONTIAC DIDNT BELIEVE SO.

[/ QUOTE ]

C'mon Don...it's the WHY I'm after...not a reiteration of the obvious facts.

Xplant...thanks for your response. The notion of particular divisions having particualr areas of responsibility for development makes sense...but weren't disc brakes pretty well developed by 1970? They appeared on 1967 model Chevrolet's and were mandatory on most performance models only 2 years later. I don't think the reason GTOs didn't get disc brakes as part of the package had anything to do with Chevrolet's claim to the development of the braking system itself, or Pontiac's lack thereof as disc brakes were available on GTOs just not a mandatory inclusion like they were on Chevrolets.
I think we may be on the right track though. Anyone else have any insight or insider information from GM?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-02-2006, 01:37 AM
RAIVJudge RAIVJudge is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Down South
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 70 GTO RPO codes question

I think each division did their own thing with some options. My RA3 Judge convertible has non-power drums at all corners. 70 GTO's could be ordered like that. My 70 Olds W-30 has non-power discs, but disc's were mandatory on W-30 Cars. I know one thing, I should have put disc's on the Judge when I restored it. Kinda scary....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.